Prince Harry "erased behind Meghan": the confidences of his biographer
In a column published in the "Sunday Telegraph," Angela Levin, the author of Prince Harry's official biography, delivers a scathing criticism of his new life in California.
A year after the "Megxit", Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle continue to be the subject of speculation. In January 2020, the two spouses indeed announced their desire to leave their royal duties and become financially independent in Los Angeles, where they now reside with their son Archie (20 months).
A new life far from the British monarchy which arouses curiosity and arouses strong criticism, including that of the English journalist Angela Levin, at the origin of the official biography of the Duke of Sussex, published in 2018. In a column of "Sunday Telegraph ", titled" How America Changed Prince Harry "and posted on Sunday January 3, the biographer says in particular that the brother of Prince William has" become the shadow of himself ", he who was previously" accessible ”and“ connected to people ”.
"HE APPEARS TO AGREE TO FACE HIMSELF BEHIND MEGHAN"
The one who followed the Duke of Sussex for several months to write his biography then explains that he "fades behind Meghan": "He seems to have given up his life as a man of action to become a wacky benefactor (...) S 'he hesitated to be Prince William's “substitute”, he seems to agree to step aside behind Meghan ”. Angela Levin also evokes the evolutions of language of Prince Harry, heard in their new podcast channel on Spotify, called "Archewell Studio". "Her Californian transformation is well advanced," says the author. “They often say that love wins. I don't think many royals have felt such love in the past twelve months. "
Last December, when the couple were officially due to leave the British monarchy in the spring of 2021, the "Daily Mail" revealed that the Sussexes finally wanted to extend their transition for a year in order to renegotiate certain terms and retain certain responsibilities. "Maybe he realizes that royalty is eternal, but not fame," concludes the biographer.
