Donald Trump's defeat against his opponent Joe Biden has caused many international media to speculate on a hypothetical divorce between the former president and his wife, Melania Trump. It should be remembered that the two signed a prenuptial agreement in which it was left in writing what would happen in the event of an end point between the two.
Peter Stambleck, of the law firm Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, has confessed to Town and Country magazine, as reported by The Mirror, that he himself recommended a prenuptial agreement based on title control to Trump. "It makes it very clear that, in the event of a divorce, everything in her name will be his and everything in her name will be hers," he explained.
He has pointed out that capital like Trump's is very complex at the administrative level, which complicates any separation: "Billionaires have complicated asset structures. They have shell companies, LLCs, investments in other companies, and it's very, very complicated."
Precisely for this reason, Trump "forced" Melania to sign this agreement. An agreement that after the electoral results resonates with more force: "One of the main purposes of a prenuptial agreement is to avoid having to share that, but also to avoid the headache that involves the production of all the documents and that the accountants come and look at everything. Theoretically, that's what could happen in the absence of a prenuptial agreement."
He has also revealed that the exclusive jewels that he has been giving her during the marriage will continue to belong to Melania in the event that they end her relationship.
In addition, Jacqueline Newman, managing partner of Berkman Bottger Newman & Rodd, has also given her particular point of view to the same magazine. For her, the custody of their 14-year-old son, Barron, would fall to Melania: "I guess she would get primary custody rights from her and he would have access whenever he was in town."
As for his financial assets, he sees it impossible for him to lead a life as comfortable as he has led up to now: "In this situation, if you have 50 million dollars, you can afford to buy something. But 50 million, although definitely it's a lot of money, in new york city from what she's used to, she couldn't replicate what she has now he probably had a good idea of the kind of lifestyle they would lead so i figure the payment would be quite generous", added the professional.
It should be remembered that when Trump arrived at the White House in 2016, they modified the pre-agreement to reflect some of Melania's demands, those related to the child's welfare: "I wanted written proof that, in terms of financial opportunities and inheritance, Barron he would be treated as an equal to Trump's three eldest children," wrote The Washington Post reporter Mary Jordan in her book, The Art of Her Deal: The Untold Story of Melania Trump, as we already reported in Informalia.
