The Duke of Sussex has recently faced backlash for commemorating what he referred to as a "momentous" occasion involving his father, whom he sought to escape from.
Autumn Brewington, an associate opinions editor at the Washington Post, shared her thoughts on Prince Harry's actions. She started off by criticizing him for seemingly desiring everything in life and posed the question, "After relinquishing their royal duties, couldn't they simply pursue wealth, health, and happiness without looking back? Apparently not, or at least not yet."
The author referred to Prince Harry's previous accusations against the Windsors, highlighting how he perceived them as "toxic" and feeling trapped within their midst. During that time, Prince Harry had expressed his desire for a family rather than being part of an institution.
According to Mr. Brewington's perspective, the specifics of who snubbed whom are not essential in understanding the compromises made during the Coronation. He points out that Prince Harry returned for his father's sake but said little about the monarchy that he and his wife deliberately left behind by crossing an ocean.
