The attorney, named Stecklow, expressed his agreement with Prince Harry's concerns about the paparazzi during an interview with The Mail Online.
He acknowledged that it was natural for someone who had experienced their mother's death in an automobile accident involving the paparazzi to be apprehensive about facing similar intrusive behavior.
Stecklow further commented, stating, "If the only incident they are worried about is the online video, it doesn't seem to reach the level of criminal behavior." He also highlighted that photographers engaging in news-related coverage of celebrities are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
These statements and assertions align with the sentiments expressed by New York lawyer Matthew Leish, who cautioned, "If Harry possesses video evidence depicting a high-speed pursuit, then the situation may change."
Before concluding, Leish also emphasized, "There is no expectation of privacy inside a taxi, and New York law does not recognize claims of invasion of privacy."
In summary, legal experts concur that Prince Harry's concerns about the paparazzi are justified, particularly in light of the tragic circumstances surrounding Diana's passing.
