Despite his loss in the legal battle challenging the British government's decision to deny him police protection during his visits to the UK, there is a belief that King Charles III should have provided support to his younger son.
This sentiment was shared by royal expert Kristen Meinzer during an episode of the Newsweek podcast, The Royal Report. Meinzer acknowledged the royal family's history of success in legal matters but expressed a desire for Charles or another member of the family to step forward.
She speculated that their involvement could potentially resolve the issue and eliminate the need for a lawsuit. However, she also voiced skepticism, stating that she doubted Charles would take a stand in defense of Harry. Meinzer's curiosity extended to the positions of other royals in this case.
She mentioned instances in which other members of the royal family sought protection for individuals who were not of royal status. For example, Prince William had a panic button installed in Kate Middleton's residence prior to their marriage to ensure her safety.
The expert surmised that given these past experiences, the other members of the royal family might understand Harry's predicament and hoped that someone would have offered support.
She emphasized that Harry is still considered a member of the family, maintaining his title and public status as a representative of the institution.
Therefore, during his infrequent visits to the UK, the royal family could have assured him that they would find a way to protect him.
