The National Theatre's purpose extends beyond producing timeless masterpieces from history; it also aims to share the narratives of modern Britain, fostering a dialogue within the country through the medium of theater.
For the past 45 years, the Queen herself had been a patron of the National Theatre. However, she swiftly handed over this patronage to Meghan Markle just a few months after her marriage. It is unprecedented for someone who married into the royal family to receive such a remarkable honor and prestige. One would expect an actress in this position to be humbled and fully dedicated to the patronage of the National Theatre.
How many actors could even fathom themselves in this position? How many American actresses, with grace and decency, would wholeheartedly commit themselves to such an opportunity if they were to marry into the Royal Family? There are undoubtedly many who would, as America has produced exceptional actresses and artists who understand the importance of British culture, particularly in the realm of theater and the National Theatre.
At times, it's unfathomable how vulgar, spoiled, and ignorant Meghan Markle is. She was bestowed upon the world and granted prestigious patronages, only to disrespectfully disregard the Queen and the monarchy despite the honors bestowed upon her. It has been reported that she initially pretended to be interested in history, archives, and learning about British culture and literature before the wedding.
As a true narcissistic psychopath, she charmed everyone with her apparent thirst for knowledge. However, it all proved to be a facade, as she abruptly lost interest and showed her rudeness to historians, claiming boredom and never returning.
The late Queen, a true feminist and an icon, had astute knowledge of Meghan's true nature. Even with decades of training in maintaining a composed poker face, she couldn't hide her disapproval at the wedding.
I believe the patronage, the allocation of Frogmore, and the grand spectacle of the wedding were all orchestrated with three main intentions in mind. Firstly, to prevent a repeat of the Diana situation where an outsider could claim alienation from the family. Secondly, to establish a meticulously documented public record demonstrating that they were not racially biased, and that Meghan was provided with unprecedented opportunities.
And thirdly, this could potentially explain why Meghan had a non-disclosure agreement with Andrew, using it as leverage to attain whatever she desired.
I have a hunch that the Queen assumed Meghan would be overwhelmed by her luck in joining the royal family, enthralled by the luxury and fame bestowed upon her, ultimately leading her to embark on a whimsical, fantasy-filled journey.
As one commenter astutely pointed out, the royals bent over backward for Meghan, but she lacks an ounce of respectability, sincerity, and gratitude.
It appears that the courtiers were accurate in their assessment that Meghan did not envision a life within the royal family that came with certain restrictions. Meghan's desires seem to revolve around Hollywood fame, wealth, as well as the respectability and global philanthropic persona associated with Princess Diana. She aspires to have all the top brands at her feet, private jet travels, palaces, and freebies without any scrutiny, accountability, or audits.
Considering her brief tenure within the royal family, less than two years in total and merely 72 days as a full-time working royal, Meghan's belief in her stardom and conquering the world while expecting acquiescence from Princess Catherine is quite audacious. One can only imagine the potential damage they would inflict on the royal staff and the likelihood of cover-ups, to the detriment of the monarchy itself.
Furthermore, it is evident that Meghan harbors an aversion to real work, especially if she isn't front and center, receiving all the attention. According to Tom Bauer's book, she was told by a college professor that she possessed some acting talent but needed to put in hard work to refine her craft and gain experience on stage. However, Meghan's focus was primarily on acting for fame, accolades, significant remuneration, and perks, rather than a genuine passion for the art and a commitment to becoming the best she could be. This lack of dedication and effort likely contributed to her acting career's lackluster progress.
As a child, Meghan displayed little interest in performance. While Catherine was perceived as a more convincing princess in a school play and showcased singing talent, Meghan was driven to various dance and acting classes in Hollywood. From videos available, it becomes apparent that her priority lay not in the quality of her performance but rather in her position and the role she played. In fact, a Daily Mail article recounts her collaboration with Nina Capridi, where she even created a self-proclaimed "Megan and Nikki" award for the teachers involved.
When Meghan was asked by Prince Harry if she had ever tried stage acting, she responded negatively, stating that she believed television required more talent and effort than legitimate theater. This remark highlighted her ignorance and lack of cultured understanding. Meghan's disinterest in stage work, a craft demanding substantial effort, is unsurprising since she would struggle to secure roles in Broadway or Off-Broadway productions due to her perceived lack of acting prowess and diva-like behavior.
A royal expert posited that it would be logical to grant theater patronage to an actress, even if she were mediocre at best. Many individuals in various professions, regardless of their skill level, appreciate and support their respective fields. However, Meghan fails to demonstrate such appreciation or support for the art of theater.
It is possible that the British royal family faced three challenges regarding Meghan, and they attempted to be unbiased in their approach. Firstly, being American, she lacked certain knowledge and sensibilities that middle-class Britons would possess. Secondly, as an American middle-class individual, with her father working as a skilled labor professional, her background might have been better understood had she been British.
Socially, her family's status was lower than that of the Duchess of Edinburgh and the Princess of Wales, even though they too were commoners. Lastly, Meghan's demeanor was perceived as vulgar and pushy, raising questions as to whether her American identity or race played a role. The royal family, though initially giving her the benefit of the doubt, could not ignore the fact that she was a subpar actress.
The late Queen, however, displayed brilliance in her actions. She aimed to publicly and undeniably demonstrate that she had provided Meghan with every opportunity, ensuring that any accusations of racism against the royal family would lack credibility. She was well aware of Meghan's true nature from the beginning and knew that given enough leeway, Meghan would eventually expose herself in a spectacular fashion.
The late Queen granted her that leeway and was proven correct in her assessment. Furthermore, she might have been aware, through her intelligence sources, that Meghan and Harry, led by Harry's strong influence, had planned their exit and secured secret deals before the grand spectacle unfolded. The late Queen understood that Meghan would not stick around long enough to cause any lasting or even short-term damage to the theater.
