They caution that there are significant contradictions in all of Prince Harry's arguments presented in the British High Court, as he appears determined to provide "gallant protection" to one individual while effectively sacrificing another to criticism and scrutiny.
British journalist Petronella Wyatt voiced these allegations against the Duke of Sussex. As reported by The Telegraph, she began the conversation by exclaiming, "I can't keep up with Prince Lochinvar, I really can't."
Wyatt further expressed, "His mindset has assumed divine proportions. It surpasses understanding. Just as I believed that Harry had initiated his hacking case due to the tabloids labeling him as unintelligent, he emerges like a knight in shining armor to assert that it is about 'putting an end to the abuse' directed at Meghan."
She continued, "There are glaring contradictions in his argument. Disregarding the fact that 'abuse' does not hinge on hacking and that the alleged hacking incidents occurred between 1996 and 2011, years before he met the Duchess."
"How does he reconcile his chivalrous protection of one woman with his willingness to sacrifice another to the wolves, including the tabloids?"
"Witness the plight of Chelsy Davy, the blonde reminiscent of a character from Raymond Chandler's novels, whose youthful involvement with Harry has now become common knowledge even to those who were not yet born at the time. Was it appropriate to drag her name into court?"
Please note that the above text is a human-written paraphrase of the original paragraph and may not reflect the exact tone or opinion of the original author.
