Referring to the delicate nature of the country's constitutional arrangements, Glover emphasized the understanding that the monarchy, along with its associated pomp and circumstance, should remain separate from political affairs.
This arrangement has been successfully upheld over the past two centuries due to the monarchs' awareness of their limited powers and their respect for elected politicians' governance, supported by royal advice.
The Daily Mail reports that Glover strongly believes Prince Harry's recent behavior clashes with this tradition and could potentially damage the delicate relationship between the Crown and Parliament. He suggests that the late Queen Elizabeth II, who impeccably grasped the significance of preserving this vital relationship, would have been deeply saddened by Harry's coarse political rhetoric.
Glover metaphorically describes Prince Harry as an "unguided missile" constantly seeking out adversaries, emitting smoke, creating noise, and ultimately causing inevitable explosions. Moreover, he highlights the baffling pattern where Prince Harry abruptly changes course, mysteriously redirecting his attention to new targets.
These observations raise concerns about the potential consequences of Prince Harry's actions and their impact on the fragile balance between the monarchy and politics. As the hacking trial unfolds, the comparison to an "unguided missile" provides a vivid depiction of Prince Harry's unpredictable behavior and its potential ramifications.
