This situation is reminiscent of Humpty Dumpty, as even the most powerful figures in the industry couldn't mend the cracks. Bill Simmons called them "effing grifters," Taylor Swift declined their podcast offer, and now Jeremy Zuma from the United Talent Agency boldly states that Meghan lacks talent.
Spotify must be extremely disappointed to have such leaks coming from high-level and A-list sources like top executives and Taylor Swift. It appears that Spotify is determined to bring the House of Harkle to its knees. HG Tudor predicted this about a month ago, and it seems that the end is near.
Furthermore, Netflix has all but confirmed that they won't renew their contract with Harry and Meghan in 2025. Waiting until then seems highly unlikely. It's possible they might hold out until they release "Heart of Invictus" and capitalize on the ensuing publicity. Afterward, I believe they'll cut their losses and make their exit.
Now, the big question is, will they go the route of a public and messy divorce, similar to Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, or will they choose to live as pariahs in exile, much like Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII? I used to think Meghan would never leave Harry unless she had another man lined up, but lately, I believe she might cut him loose and pursue her own path because, at this point, she's become incredibly radioactive.
Why is Harry also considered radioactive? The latest remarks from Taylor Swift and Jeremy Zuma point to Meghan as the one who carries this label. Zuma's statement captures the essence of the situation perfectly, emphasizing that fame doesn't automatically equate to greatness. The initial hype surrounding their Oprah interview led people to believe they were onto something significant, that the Royals were truly evil. However, what they ended up producing was constant whining and a campaign against the Royals. That's when people began to tune out.
Let's not forget that their excessive talking will eventually catch up with them. Karma has a way of balancing things out, but in this case, it's not just karma at play. Industry insiders are realizing that Meghan and Harry are primarily known for their notoriety. While notoriety can grab headlines for the controversial things they say, when it comes to earning substantial income, it takes more than just notoriety. It requires a combination of talent and genuine effort.
One interesting tidbit I came across was from a talk show where they mentioned that Harry's comment during the Oprah interview about needing to make money for his security horrified the Spotify bosses. They must have thought, "Oh my God, we paid them millions of dollars, but their primary concern is their security. They don't really have much else to offer in terms of success."
So, after trashing the royal family, what do they truly possess? What talents, ideas, or production value can they bring to the table? These are the questions that arise when examining their current situation.
Meghan continually emphasizes that she grew up in Hollywood, but it seems she failed to learn the valuable lessons her father and the stars of Hollywood teach—the importance of hard work and talent in becoming A-listers. She had the belief that once she reached a certain level, deals would come pouring in. Despite spending decades in Hollywood, her greatest achievement remains a supporting role in a cable show.
There's a quote I particularly like that encapsulates their situation perfectly: "Mediocrity is always invisible until passion shows up and exposes it." Many people shared this sentiment about Meghan and Harry but were hesitant to express it openly. For a few years, the public atmosphere was charged with racial tensions, making everyone in the public eye walk on eggshells.
Meghan cleverly preemptively labeled any criticism as racist, thereby deterring anyone from risking their reputation to speak out against her. Oprah and Gayle King helped reinforce the narrative that Meghan was a victim of racial abuse. This shielded her from criticism in American media.
However, the dam finally broke when South Park openly called out Meghan for her flaws. This act gave others the courage to acknowledge what they truly thought about her—a liar, a hypocrite, manipulative, and lacking substance. They saw her as someone solely focused on her personal brand, with no depth or authenticity. Once the floodgates opened, people started voicing their true opinions about Meghan.
The fawning puff pieces in American media were merely paid public relations efforts, and the majority of people never liked Meghan once they became aware of the full extent of her character. It's worth noting that there hasn't been any backlash against Spotify for dropping them, Taylor Swift rejecting Meghan, or the critical comments from Bill Simmons, among others.
There has been no clarification from Swift or Simmons, nor any distancing by Spotify. This silence contrasts with how things would have played out just six months ago, before the Oprah interview. That interview truly marked their downfall in the United States, revealing their true nature and making people unafraid to distance themselves. It's highly likely that Netflix will have no qualms about dropping them once the documentary is released.
As for what lies ahead, personally, I hope they never divorce. They deserve to be miserable together for the rest of their lives. However, if Meghan does leave Harry—which, let's be honest, is the only way a divorce would occur—it depends on whether Harry finds a way back to the United Kingdom and who becomes King.
If Charles assumes the throne, he might bring Harry back under Buckingham Palace's public relations efforts to rehabilitate his image, with Harry expected to keep his mouth shut. On the other hand, if William becomes King, he might simply place Harry wherever Andrew ends up. In that scenario, a messy public divorce seems likely.
However, an insider presented a compelling argument, suggesting that Charles has a loving wife, a son with whom he has grown closer after some distant years, a daughter-in-law he respects and likes, and three warm and affectionate grandchildren. It seems Harry despises these six individuals more than anyone else on the planet, even the children. Given this, it's doubtful that Charles has any desire to keep bending over backwards to reconcile with a son who continually seeks to destroy the people Charles loves most.
