MGN is currently facing multiple lawsuits from notable individuals who allege that the company engaged in unlawful information gathering practices across its publications, including The Mirror, Sunday Mirror, and Sunday People.
While MGN largely contests these claims, arguing that some were submitted too late, they have admitted to one instance of unlawful information gathering involving Prince Harry in February 2004.
During the closing argument, Andrew Green KC, representing MGN, argued for minimal compensation. He stated, "Given that the single invoice refers to inquiries on an isolated occasion, and the small sum on the invoice (£75) suggests limited inquiries, the Duke of Sussex should be awarded a maximum of £500."
The defense emphasized that this isolated incident should not overshadow the overall context of the case. Earlier this month, Prince Harry made an emotional appearance at the High Court, where he faced intense questioning regarding his involvement in the phone hacking case against MGN.
Throughout the grilling, the Duke of Sussex appeared uncertain and responded with "I don't know" 18 times. Additionally, he admitted to not recalling certain details on nine occasions.
Prince Harry disclosed that his decision to pursue legal action against tabloid newspapers was influenced by a chance encounter in France. He testified that he met his current lawyer, David Sherborne, around 2018 while in France.
When asked about his initial concerns regarding potentially unlawful articles, Prince Harry clarified that he had never been presented with any evidence of such activity. He stated, "No, I was never shown anything. It was all contained within the palace."
Furthermore, Prince Harry discussed his conversations with lawyers, highlighting that the primary objective was to find a way to halt the abuse and intrusion targeted at him and his wife, Meghan, without solely relying on the institution's legal team. He emphasized his desire to protect his family from further harm.
The case against MGN and the testimonies provided have shed light on the ongoing battle between celebrities and media outlets concerning privacy invasion and unethical practices.
With several high-profile individuals pursuing legal action against the publisher, the outcome of this lawsuit has the potential to set a precedent for future cases involving similar allegations.
As the proceedings at the High Court come to a close, the decision regarding Prince Harry's compensation now rests in the hands of the judge.
The significance of this ruling extends beyond the financial aspect, as it will shape the legal landscape surrounding media ethics and accountability.
Both the claimants and the defense eagerly await the court's verdict, which will ultimately determine the consequences that MGN faces for its alleged unlawful information gathering practices.
