Despite the ongoing divorce process, Harry and Meghan should be removed from the royal family website at the very least. The smoke and mirrors continue to emanate from their side in California. It's worth noting that there's a law in California banning photography of minor children.
However, Harry has been photographed with fuzzy pictures of Lilibet, which has raised questions about her growth. It's also interesting to see a British prince and princess celebrating American Independence Day, which signifies the downfall of the British association with the 13 American colonies.
But let's not be surprised. Harry and Meghan always strive to keep themselves in the spotlight. While King Charles was preparing to receive Scottish honors, they couldn't resist seeking publicity. They are publicity fiends, constantly seeking attention and staying in the forefront.
Their public image is carefully crafted, portraying themselves as global royals living in America. The fact that their children were photographed indicates that Harry and Meghan colluded to have the pictures published, as photographers would face legal consequences for violating California law.
If Harry and Meghan are in the process of divorce, why were they seen together on July 4th? And why did they purposely overshadow the king's coronation? It seems that Harry and Meghan can't resist inserting themselves into every narrative to achieve publicity. They are professional spoilers and compulsively competitive. Meghan has encouraged Harry to criticize his own family, including his brother and even the late Princess Diana.
As for the divorce, it's important to clarify that while negotiations may be happening, it's uncertain if they are actually divorcing. Their marriage is certainly rocky, with both of them fighting for their professional and personal survival.
Harry has burned bridges and now finds himself marooned in California. Many of his former acquaintances in the UK no longer want to be associated with him, feeling betrayed by his actions. There was no prenuptial agreement, as Harry believed in the purity of their love. Unfortunately, Megan has taken advantage of Harry's vulnerabilities and weaknesses, bringing out his dark side. Prenuptial agreements wouldn't matter in this case.
Some may wonder why the royal family hasn't taken affirmative action against the Sussexes. It's crucial to consider that Harry is an adult and responsible for his own actions. While the royal family would be concerned about a family member going through a divorce, they don't wish to be involved in any unsavory situations or dirty laundry. They want to avoid being dragged into a lengthy and publicized divorce, especially considering the lack of credibility from both Harry and Meghan, who have told numerous lies.
Divorces can be traumatic, and families often seek to resolve them without causing further harm. They may offer financial settlements to eliminate the trauma and avoid prolonged media attention. As for the removal of titles, it's a matter of debate, and King Charles III's stance on the birthright and the line of succession remains to be seen. It's clear that a prenuptial agreement wasn't necessary since Harry doesn't have access to any royal assets or tangible property in the UK.
Thank you for tuning in to today's discussion on the intriguing world of royalty. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section below. Stay tuned for more updates on this ongoing saga. Thank you for watching, and we'll see you again with more fascinating news about the royal family.
When it comes to Harry and Meghan's divorce, it won't be a typical royal divorce but rather a Californian divorce between two pretentious individuals. Harry's true assets are limited to what is in his trust fund, as he didn't serve in the Army long enough to receive a pension. Allegedly, at the age of 21, Prince William and Prince Harry split the first half of their trust fund money from their great-grandmother, totaling around £6 million or $7.8 million.
There have been reports that Harry received the majority of the inheritance to compensate for not becoming sovereign, but this claim has been debunked. There is no trust fund from their great-grandmother. It doesn't make sense, considering that the Queen Mother passed away with significant debt. Forbes has also dismissed the idea of compensating Harry for not being sovereign. Furthermore, the idea of compensating previous spares from previous generations doesn't hold water.
Regarding Diana's estate, it is estimated that £22 million was available at the time of her death. After probate, taxes, and bequests, the remaining amount was around £16 million. This was divided equally between William and Harry. Diana structured her will more like a conventional civilian rich person, ensuring the well-being of each of her offspring rather than focusing on the heir to a position and estate.
Diana's executors had the authority to make variations and act differently from what her will stated, as Diana repeatedly deferred to their judgment. Upon turning 30, William and Harry gained unencumbered access to the principal of their respective trusts. There has been speculation about whether Harry depleted his inheritance or if any funds are remaining. However, it's important to note that this money was from his mother's side, even if the origin was the money Charles gave Diana in the divorce settlement.
There is no Queen Mother trust, and Anne is not overseeing another version of the trust until William and Harry turn 40. These are fallacies that keep circulating, but in reality, they hold no truth. The British royal family would have no involvement in Harry's personal funds, as it was his money from his mother's side.
