Currently, Meghan and Harry are facing personal and professional troubles, and they must present a united front. Now, let's move on to the gossip about Dior. It seems that Dior was initially interested in Harry, not Meghan. However, Meghan's involvement ended up ruining the deal.
Just imagine the scene that played out in Montecito, with Harry questioning why Dior would want him without Meghan. In an attempt to prove her love, Meghan insisted that Dior include her as well. Eventually, Dior rejected both of them.
In an effort to salvage the situation, Meghan tried to coerce Dior by announcing that the deal was done. Yes, it's the same Mr. Larson we mentioned earlier. I've actually spoken to him. He even tried to follow me at Royal Ascot when I attended with Thomas Markle.
I made it clear to Mr. Larson that I wanted no further contact, but Meghan seems to need him to maintain the façade of unity with Harry.
One commenter pointed out that it doesn't make sense for Dior to want Harry just because he's a prince. Perhaps Dior is aiming to attract more male customers, much like they did with David Beckham. It seems Meghan wouldn't support being a Dior brand ambassador on her own when she's not wanted. She feels the need to bring Harry down with her. If Dior had offered her a contract alone, she would have signed it in an instant.
Now, let's discuss Meghan's appearance in the Netflix documentary. It struck me that she was styled in a similar manner to her look at the Queen's Jubilee, with that creamy-looking, plastic-like skin and black-rimmed eyes. It seemed like she wanted to remind the world that she was invited to such events and has connections to the royal family. Yet, for the TV documentary, she portrayed herself as independent and unimpressed with the British royal family and the Commonwealth. It's all an act, as fake as the tip of her nose and the veneers on her teeth.
By the way, Carl Lawson was associated with someone named Jeff Rainer, who was supposed to help Thomas Markle. However, they ended up damaging his reputation. It's quite unsavory, isn't it? I hope nobody was deceived by those photos in Montecito. Did you notice how quickly Meghan and Harry separated as soon as they thought the cameras were turned off? Snap, snap, Mr. Larson.
We have previously reported that Meghan believes she channels Diana. What are your thoughts on Harry's belief that Diana is giving her and Meghan approval from beyond the grave? It's certainly an interesting perspective to consider.
Yes, something seems very wrong. It's astonishing that Harry would allow people to believe that Diana is communicating with Meghan and that their failures are merely a result of bad luck. In reality, their troubles stem from their own treachery, betrayal, disloyalty, and misconduct. They moved to America, seeking fortune, and misfortune struck.
Then they gave the controversial Oprah interview, and Prince Philip passed away, which they conveniently attribute to bad timing. But, of course, it's not just a matter of unfortunate coincidences; it's a betrayal of family trust and secrets.
Furthermore, the timing of the Queen's death is seen as unfavorable, while Harry used his book as a confessional. Meghan has convinced Harry that Diana is guiding them to continue on their chosen path. It's impossible for Harry to live with Meghan and not be influenced by her disordered thinking and behavior. Despite their troubled marriage, they remain together, and they may always be together. It's unclear if Harry has the strength to leave her.
Interestingly, Meghan and Harry are attempting to erase their failures by blaming everything on bad luck. Prince William is reportedly attempting to ban Omid Scobie from royal events, and it has been revealed that Princess Catherine is the person behind the phrase "recollections may vary." I would love to hear your insights on this matter.
According to Omid Scobie, Prince William was unsuccessful in getting him banned. Doesn't this prove that the British royal family doesn't have as much power over the press as Meghan and Harry suggest? Doesn't this undermine their rhetoric?
I understand why William would want to ban Omid Scobie; however, we must acknowledge the existence of a free press. It's impossible to control the media entirely. The fact that Prince William couldn't have Omid Scobie banned speaks volumes. Meghan and Harry's claims about the royal family's relationship with the press appear to be false.
As for Catherine's insistence on the comment, there's a significant difference between "never complain, never explain" and allowing oneself to be trampled upon. Sometimes the royals are too timid. Catherine and William both possess backbone, and together they will prevail. Catherine holds immense character and has empowered William not to fight back.
Things would be different if she hadn't encouraged him in this manner. It doesn't take much; one must simply be effective and willing to draw a line. Dignity requires one to say "stop" or "no" at times. Catherine, the Princess of Wales, knows when to do this. She has no intention of allowing Meghan and Harry to destroy her life and her family.
I recently read the book "Daughter of Narcissus," which made me realize that the royal family will be dealing with this issue for a very long time. Harry has two children with Meghan, making the matter even more serious. It's no wonder Trevor Whitewashed Meghan from his life; it was an act of self-preservation.
This is why I have been so emphatic about the absence of easy solutions when dealing with someone as clearly narcissistic, antisocial, and ruthless as Meghan. And now, Harry seems to be influenced by her as well. We must be aware that we don't know what's coming next. The royal family is fully aware that this will be an ongoing problem they'll have to deal with for many years to come.
What will happen to those children? This could become an ongoing saga of the most dreadful nature. My mother had the grace to keep our family's private issues private. I don't believe Meghan will do the same; she will tell lies, and the possibilities of what lies she might tell are endless. She weaponizes publicity.
This is why I have so much compassion for the royal family. I am aware of many things that fortunately have not become public. The irony is that Meghan and Harry, in their attempt to trash the royal family, have not emerged as the victors they hoped to be. But they need to sell something. Can they redeem themselves by behaving decently? That's what they should have done from the beginning. They're impatient and frustrated because they aren't being recognized as the great people they believe themselves to be. However, greatness is not within them.
It's amusing how Meghan is a skilled manipulator in private but a terrible actress professionally. Well observed. Individuals like Meghan possess genius-level manipulation skills, which is why their victims become entangled. However, this talent doesn't always translate to professional acting.
