She asked Harry to let her join the trip with the paparazzi team to do a PR stunt, but he refused. Prince Harry said that he would really like to go to Africa and try to stop some of the animals from becoming extinct, which seems perfectly sound.
But it's not actually Meghan's territory; that's what Miss Levin said, telling Sky News host Paul Murray. She wants to go with him to help people build homes for the natives.
Sources claim the couple is facing financial trouble after a key media deal went down the pan. Although insiders close to the pair deny any schism in their relationship, rumors of financial pressure on Prince Harry and Meghan continue to swirl after the couple lost their deal with Spotify.
A source told Page Six that the couple is under tremendous financial pressure to fund their lavish California lifestyle, including their $14 million mansion and huge security costs. That stress, coupled with their emotional issues, has likely made life a living hell. Taking time apart on different continents will hopefully help them find whatever they need to move on.
Meanwhile, an anonymous tipster told Domoy that the pair had sold their mansion in Montecito, and Harry was living somewhere else. However, an insider close to the couple assured Page Six that rumors of any kind of breakdown in the couple's relationship are completely inaccurate, saying it's not true; it's literally made up.
Harry is understood to be heading to Africa solo to work on a new Netflix documentary. Last month, Harry and Markle's $20 million deal with Spotify came to an abrupt end before their Archewell Audio podcast could even see its second season.
This was reportedly due to a lack of good ideas for shows, with Harry understood to have pitched interviews with Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, Vladimir Putin, and Pope Francis, leaving executives puzzled. Sports podcaster Bill Simmons, one of Spotify's most senior execs, called the Prince and the former actress "rifters" after the deal broke down.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's rift and separation rumors have sparked new online debate over the custody of their two children, Archie and Norman. Reacting to a report by Page Six titled "Rumors Swirl, There's Trouble and Prayer Times for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle," one more little fan commented, "So how to chat with a friend from the UK who is into all this Royal stuff, and she said if they split up, determination of who gets the kids could be determined by an old royal family law that states those whose loins the children came from as the determination of if the child is in line to the throne."
Another said, "When Charles and Diana were divorcing, the jurisdiction of the crown could come into play, stating that the Queen was the guardian of William and Harry. Whenever I mentioned that fact to people, they didn't know that I was even talking about that."
Earlier, amidst reports that Meghan Markle and Harry's marriage was in trouble, Royal commentator and author Patronella White declared that the royal couple could not divorce. According to Patronella Wyatt, Meghan and Harry's divorce is unlikely due to American custody laws and the Duke of Sussex's strained relationship with his estranged brother, Prince William.
