The Queen, before her passing, allegedly conducted a secret investigation and became distressed upon discovering the truth.
It appears that Meghan is prohibited from setting foot in Ballmoral, as the Queen suspected, given the severing of all communications and the absence of Zoom calls involving Lilibet.
The Queen identified a key distinction between Archie and Lilibet's birth certificates. In the UK, birth certificates are publicly accessible, and anyone can request to view them.
Falsely registering a birth is considered a grave offense. Hence, claims suggesting Lilibet's birth was the result of surrogacy hold no credibility, as they demonstrate a lack of understanding of the actual laws in the UK.
If such claims were true, it would mean that neither Archie nor Lilibet would be in the line of succession. There is a legal provision that prohibits adopted children or children born via surrogacy from being included in the line of succession, as stated in the Succession to the Crown Bill on March 13, 2013, in the UK Parliament's Hansard.
Examining Lilibet's birth certificate raises doubts about its authenticity. The hospital named on the certificate has no record of the birth, and the child has not been listed in the order of succession by the royal family.
Contrasting Archie's birth certificate, which correctly indicated his father as HRH Prince Henry Charles Albert David, Duke of Sussex, Lilibet's certificate displays a different structure. It is filled out as "first name: The Duke of Sussex, surname:
His Royal Highness," even though Harry's first name is not "The Duke of Sussex," and his surname is not "His Royal Highness." One would assume that Harry should have filled it out as "first name: HRH Prince Henry Charles Albert David" or simply "HRH Prince Henry," with the surname being "Duke of Sussex." This raises questions about whether TMZ, the publication that released the certificate, falsified it or confused the details about Harry's name.
Moreover, why couldn't they access the actual certificate? Did Harry struggle with the form due to its differing layout from the British version, where he could write "HRH Prince Henry Charles Albert David, Duke of Sussex" in its entirety? If so, why wasn't someone available to assist him? It seems unlikely that Americans would prioritize titles over actual names.
As a consequence, it is believed that immediate members of the royal family did not attend the ceremony, which reportedly took place near the Sussexes' home in Montecito, California.
