Meghan seemed to believe that as an American, her lack of knowledge about the British royal family or any royals would go unnoticed.
However, if we take a moment to think about it, her reputation is already in the gutter, and Prince Harry has a greater chance of recovering from it. Meghan's narcissism blinds her, and she perceives everyone as a threat. She doesn't appreciate it when people call her out on her dishonesty.
Meghan presents herself as intelligent, but if she genuinely couldn't comprehend that her son couldn't be a prince from birth because his father is not the heir to the throne, then she's just as uninformed as Harry.
I don't mean to be harsh, but anyone with an understanding of how the British monarchy works would know that King George V established a rule stating that only the direct heirs of the current monarch receive titles at birth.
For instance, Princess Charlotte's future children will not have titles because they descend from the female line. Princess Anne's children, Peter and Zara, serve as prime examples of this. Although the rules can be altered, such as the queen's willingness to give titles to her two eldest grandchildren if their mother had wanted it, Princess Anne declined the offer. It's worth noting that Queen Elizabeth also changed the succession rule before Prince George's birth to include girls, making it easier down the line so that Charlotte and Louis wouldn't question why their brother had a title and they didn't.
Regarding Archie's title, Meghan and Harry initially stated that they didn't want him to have one. Then the story changed, suggesting that the queen had offered the title of Earl of Dumbarton, which Meghan refused due to the inclusion of the word "dumb." One can imagine how the Scottish people reacted when that story emerged. Thus, Meghan's claim that her son was denied a title because of his skin color is incorrect. She cannot genuinely believe she was that naive.
Another point of contention is Meghan's assertion during the engagement interview that she didn't know who Harry or his family was. Her former best friend, Ninaki Priddy, debunked that claim even before the wedding in 2018.
Additionally, a February 2023 FEMA article also contradicted her statement. Now, let's briefly address the rumor about the Sussexes wanting to share the monarchy with William and Catherine once they ascend the throne. As I have already debunked, this claim is inaccurate. Even if it were true, both Meghan and Harry are incredibly naive to think that the queen or Charles would agree to such an idea.
Another example of Meghan's naivety is her belief that she is a hardworking individual, despite only putting in an hour of work each week. If you want to see a true workhorse, look no further than Princess Anne. One particular story that irked me was Meghan's claim of being unaware of tabloids.
However, Katie Hein came forward and said that Meghan had drinks with her before meeting Harry and begged to be featured in her column. Furthermore, a paparazzo confirmed that Meghan had indeed called him to take photos. Unfortunately, the video seems to have disappeared. Her alleged friend and cheerleader, Omid Scobie, mentioned in his book "Finding Freedom" that she did have involvement with the paparazzi.
It's perplexing how Meghan believes the world to be so gullible. There are doubts that they even reside in the Montecito Mansion, as they film in other locations like San Ysidro Ranch. If they truly disliked their house, as they claimed, it must be disheartening for Meghan. Perhaps she will reveal the full story during the Sussexes' upcoming Netflix series or in some other form.
