Yesterday, a source claimed that Meghan and Harry have never actually lived together as a couple and that Meghan stays with the children at San Ysidro Ranch, owned by her father-in-law, while Harry is frequently traveling. However, it has now been revealed that this information was released by Meghan's own team.
The domain name of the article was linked to the Archfall organization, suggesting Meghan's involvement in this PR effort. This attempt was likely made to divert attention from her recent failures and ongoing divorce rumors, as well as to seek sponsorship from King Charles.
By emphasizing her living arrangements with the children, Meghan aimed to provide proof of their existence.
Unfortunately, this PR ploy has backfired, as Meghan and her media team at Archworld failed to verify the accurate information about San Ysidro Ranch. It was actually King Charles III of Spain who owned the ranch in the 1700s, causing Meghan's confusion with King Charles III of England.
It's highly unlikely that King Charles III of England would provide residence at San Ysidro Ranch for his grandchildren.
The ranch is, in fact, a luxury resort located in the Montecito foothills, and it is not privately owned. It's inconceivable that anyone, especially with two children, would permanently reside there, given its reputation and the disruption it would cause to other guests.
This story of Meghan staying in a chalet owned by King Charles is entirely unsubstantiated, and it's clear that the royal family owns extensive properties worldwide, including in the United States.
While Meghan tries to paint a picture of her stable accommodation and single-parent status, the reality is that neither she nor Harry own any significant assets. Instead, they are burdened with debt. The attempt to portray Harry as staying in a chalet paid for by King Charles III serves as a spin to reinforce Meghan's connections and imply support from the monarchy.
However, the truth remains that Harry is currently residing in the Laurel Cottage at San Ysidro Ranch, which is the largest cottage available but certainly not privately owned.
