For example, it was luck that led George the first to become king, despite being 52nd in line to the throne, simply because he was the closest Protestant, following the rules. Similarly, luck favored Edward VII when he chose to reside in France with Wallis Simpson, dressed in couture, instead of fulfilling royal obligations.
However, the careers of Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, have taken a different trajectory, one that they claim is marred by bad timing and unfortunate circumstances. They express disappointment in the lack of celebration from Hollywood, despite considering themselves the most exciting new talents since Scorsese's early filmmaking days.
Their recent split from Spotify, despite promises to produce uplifting and entertaining content, further added to their professional setbacks. Harry attempted to engage global figures in discussions about childhood hugs, while Meghan sought to champion feminism by engaging in word-shaped air around successful women with more accomplished careers.
Rumors have also surfaced that their contract with Netflix may not be extended after just two years, potentially resulting in unpaid fees amounting to $76 million. It is disheartening to anticipate being discarded. To add insult to injury, the Wall Street Journal labeled them as flops, and Spotify's Bill Simmons went as far as calling them grifters.
At the Cannes Lion Festival, renowned Hollywood heavyweight Jeremy Zimmer publicly stated that Meghan Markle lacked any discernible talent. It becomes clear that being renowned does not automatically equate to being skilled in any particular field.
In such circumstances, many individuals would seek solace and introspection within the comforts of their sprawling estates, complete with amenities like Japanese-style tea houses or yoga rooms. One would expect them to confront difficult realities while immersing themselves in self-actualization and journaling about their experiences after a contemplative colonic session.
However, the Sussexes appear unwilling to take responsibility for the breakdown of their professional partnerships, according to the Daily Mail, despite consistently demanding accountability from the royal family. Instead, they attribute their decline to bad luck.
Allison Bashof, a columnist, shares that the couple believes external global events, such as the deteriorating health of Prince Philip in 2021, overshadowed their Oprah appearance, marking yet another instance of misfortune.
They argue that their attempts to establish themselves as global do-gooders were significantly hampered by the pandemic. Yet, despite years passing since their royal exit, they have not undertaken a single humanitarian journey abroad.
The Sussexes seem to consider these events as repeated strokes of bad luck, including the recent passing of the Queen, as the late monarch's death disrupted their plans. It appears they are grappling with the concept of responsibility and its impact on their current situation.
In the past year, the Sussexes claim that various factors affected the launch of Meghan's podcast. They attribute the unfortunate timing to the passing of her Majesty, revealing that three weeks' worth of programs were already prepared before the sad event occurred.
Additionally, they cite a significant stock market decline in the streaming business over the previous 18 months as another stroke of bad luck, as noted by Boshoff. However, insiders suggest that Spotify's disappointment stemmed more from the lack of content rather than the podcast's viewership figures.
It is remarkable how Harry and Meghan, if Boshoff's information is accurate, struggle to acknowledge their role in shaping their own lives and the recurring misfortunes they encounter. Despite Harry expressing a desire to address and apologize for their mistakes, he claims to receive no response to his inquiries.
It is perplexing how adults with their critical faculties can exhibit such a lack of self-awareness. One wonders if the palace's focus on managing the fallout has left them unable to respond, as they grapple with the audacity of someone complaining about privacy violations while writing a tell-all book and releasing a six-hour TV series containing images allegedly taken inside royal properties without permission.
Harry frequently mentions the importance of therapy, which is commendable. However, it is puzzling that they fail to grasp therapy's essence, which involves introspection and self-reflection. How can two individuals with expensive educations still hold such simplistic and black-and-white perspectives, devoid of nuance and complexity?
Their perception of the world and their situation seems infantile and lacking depth. They were poorly handled by self-serving individuals within the royal circle who leaked information to the media, failing to recognize the consequences of their actions. Additionally, their potential to impress Hollywood was merely constrained by circumstances.
Experts weigh in, criticizing their claim that the pandemic hindered their ability to engage in humanitarian work. They argue that opportunities to help others always exist, suggesting that the couple's actions were performative and lacking substance.
A brief moment of distributing food parcels with masks and photographers in tow does not reflect a genuine commitment to making a difference. It appears that their primary concern was not receiving PR credit, leading them to deem other efforts unnecessary.
