Type Here to Get Search Results !

Hot Widget

Prince Harry's Privacy: The Real Reason He Doesn't Disclose His Kids' Birth Dates

Prince Harry's Privacy: The Real Reason He Doesn't Disclose His Kids' Birth Dates

The true reason behind Harry's decision to keep his children's birth dates private is to protect them from enduring rumors that suggest they were born out of wedlock, just like Harry himself. 

Before we proceed, let me clarify that I have no doubts about the existence of Harry and Meghan's children. However, the circumstances surrounding their births have been shrouded in secrecy. This secrecy has raised suspicions regarding the eligibility of the children for Royal privileges. 

In previous cases, such as the births of Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Anne, Lady Diana, and Lady Catherine, the Royal household and the British government were extensively involved in the process, which helped dispel any doubts.

This level of transparency and involvement is not observed in Meghan's case. Her pregnancies and births have been unusually secretive, and the available information is either contradictory, such as conflicting timelines and statements, or outright ridiculous, like the claim that Harry was high on helium during Meghan's labor. These inconsistencies give rise to further speculation.

In the past, royal births were confirmed and verified by palace courtiers and witnessed by others. In modern times, this involves close coordination between the Royal household and the governing authorities. The reason for these formalities is to ensure the accuracy of the line of succession and the dispensation of Royal privileges.

 To illustrate, let's look at Japan, where a succession crisis occurred in 2006 due to a lack of male heirs. The birth of a male heir through the second son was a highly official event, confirmed and verified by the Imperial household and the Japanese government. In contrast, the secretive nature of Meghan's pregnancies and births is quite unusual.

Considering that Harry and Meghan's children hold high positions in the line of succession (7th and 8th), the secrecy surrounding their births is particularly noteworthy. Such matters are usually taken very seriously to avoid public speculation. Therefore, the fact that there are rampant speculations itself is unusual.

One commenter expressed a counter-intuitive and cruel hope that the children are the result of surrogacy. They would be devastated on behalf of the children if it were revealed that Meghan was pregnant with and gave birth to them. Harry and Meghan themselves, however, continually allow people to speculate, simply for the sake of attention.

If indeed the children are biologically Meghan's, but Harry has fabricated absurd and false stories about their births, while both of them have responded to everything except how the children were born, it would be the cruelest thing they have done. Harry has spoken openly in the past about how traumatizing it was for him to face false claims regarding his paternity and how it still affects him. Yet, he seems to be subjecting his own children to a similar situation.

During the interview, Meghan vehemently refuted speculations about buying a copper bath for Frogmore, an irrelevant and inconsequential matter. However, she did not address the surrogacy rumors as racist and misogynistic, seemingly content for those to persist.

In conclusion, Harry's decision to keep his children's birth dates private is driven by a desire to shield them from the rumors surrounding their legitimacy. However, this choice has given rise to further speculation and has fueled public curiosity. The contradictory information and lack of transparency have only added to the intrigue surrounding the birth of Harry and Meghan's children.

It is a harsh reality that both of Meghan's children were born from her own body. If only Archie was born of Meghan's body, then it implies that neither Harry nor Meghan love or care about those children at all. I would much rather believe that the secrecy surrounding their births stems from fear of being discovered, and they are unable to deny the rumors. 

They might know that the rumors are false but are deliberately causing trauma to their own children for their personal gain. Instead of debating whether they are the product of surrogacy or dismissing surrogacy believers as unhinged, the conversation should focus on what this speculation means in the real world. In the real world, it boils down to whether two innocent children are being abused and neglected or not. I truly hope they are not suffering abuse and neglect.

Another commenter mentioned that the idea that the children don't even exist is a natural progression of the unquestioned surrogacy story. Especially when faced with a couple obsessed with media attention, yet strangely never showcasing their children. Furthermore, when they do mention their children, the stories surrounding them are peculiar and unbelievable, such as Archie's alleged set of first words.

Additionally, there are likely chaos bots deliberately causing damage, and the fact that many surrogacy believers are Americans who may not fully grasp the complexities of UK laws and the power dynamics between the government and monarchy exacerbates the spread of conspiracy theories and hatred towards the monarchy, which can spill over to the Commonwealth.

There are also surrogacy skeptics who refuse to accept that their conspiracy theories and animosity lack validity. I have been blocked by several of them simply because they dislike the fact that the King does not possess the authority to strip the Sussexes of their titles, for example. 

Whether surrogacy is true or not, these theories benefit chaos bots, as it serves as an example of the King's perceived weakness in not removing titles and altering the line of succession. However, it is crucial to recognize that only the British government can make such changes, and the King cannot breach Megan's medical privacy, whether surrogacy is involved or not.

The situation is complex, and a deep dive will likely yield no substantial findings. We will only learn the truth if someone breaks a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and speaks out or if a member of Parliament utilizes parliamentary privilege to address the matter in the House of Commons. 

Personally, that is why I have become more inclined towards discussing the implications of the Sussexes' lack of response to this issue in the broader context. Others can delve into the most bizarre conspiracy theories they want, but everyone should be able to agree that the Sussexes' refusal to acknowledge this, despite addressing various other rumors like yacht girl allegations, copper baths, and claims of Kate making Meghan cry, shows their monstrous nature either way.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.