Here's a roundup of Meghan's suspicious pregnancy behavior. Allegedly, on August 19, 2018, Meghan flew to Toronto to visit Jessica and watched the movie "Book Club" during the flight, even indulging in champagne. She also requested that no one take her photo. Does this sound familiar?
Three days later, an update on the story came from Harper's Bazaar, stating that Meghan did not go to Toronto alone, but rather went to Italy with Harry to visit the Clooneys. It raises the question: why did Meghan desperately want to dispel the Toronto story?
On September 25, 2018, it was reported that the Sussexes had spent the previous weekend partying in Amsterdam at the Soho House. The party was described as boozy, with Meghan seen drinking a glass of red wine.
Then, on October 12, 2018, during Eugenie's wedding, Meghan was allegedly in her third month of pregnancy. It is worth noting that the timing of Meghan's three-month scan fell within a time frame of fewer than three weeks between her partying in Amsterdam and Eugenie's wedding. How perfect, right? The conception supposedly occurred less than three months after the royal wedding. Quite the coincidence for a geriatric first-time mother.
When criticized for allegedly ruining Eugenie's wedding, Harper's Bazaar published a clap back, stating that most family members knew about the pregnancy before the wedding. However, this further shrinks the already tight three-week window between Amsterdam and Eugenie's wedding.
Later on, Harry claimed that they didn't inform the family members until the wedding and described elaborate scenarios of how he shared the news with his father and brother in the library surrounded by suits of armor. Harry admitted they pulled family members aside one by one to share their good news.
According to Harry, they were forced to announce the pregnancy because Meghan was already showing. Meghan allegedly pushed her belly out and told Harry to go along with ruining Eugenie's wedding and dealing with the media attention throughout their tour.
As calculated above, the birth date does not align with having a three-month scan during Eugenie's wedding and coincidentally the day before a highly publicized tour. It raises questions about Meghan, a geriatric first-time mother, getting pregnant less than two months after the wedding. The birth date seemed perfect for competing with Charlotte and Louise. Just like everything involving Meghan, the timing appears to be absolutely perfect.
On October 15, 2018, the pregnancy announcement went public, and Meghan paraded through the South Pacific, proudly clutching an alleged baby bump throughout the tour. Interestingly, the bump seemed to fluctuate between being prominently protruding and appearing non-existent at times. Meghan even traveled to a Zika territory without showing any concern.
Contrary to the expectations of giving birth at home and not posing for photos or sharing details with anyone, including the Royal Family, Meghan reportedly snubbed the Queen's doctors and opted for her own. She expressed a preference for not having men in suits deliver her baby, as reported by the Daily Mail on January 14th.
When interacting with well-wishers, Meghan stated that she was six months along and due to give birth in late April or early May, as per a U.S. magazine. However, it seemed she either didn't know the exact due date or chose not to disclose it. Meghan faced accusations of obscuring the birth date.
An insider shared that the Queen was amazed by the duchess's energy and stamina, considering she was heavily pregnant. A royal aide revealed this to Vanity Fair. Interestingly, the impending due date happened to compete with Charlotte and Louis's birthdays, sparking curiosity about whether they would be born on the same day.
On May 2nd, Chris Ship claimed on Twitter that Meghan was four days past her due date. If this information is accurate, it would suggest a birth date of May 6th, eight days after her due date for a geriatric pregnancy.
The possible birth date falling between April 28th and May 6th indicates that conception took place somewhere between August 2nd and 20th. It's worth noting that Eugenie's wedding occurred in October, which is two months after. However, Meghan's spokesperson claimed it was a three-month scan.
Surprisingly, the royal family didn't even know the actual birth date and released an incorrect statement. Sarah Latham issued an apology after presenting what was believed to be Archie on May 8th. Shortly after, Prince Harry left for a visit to the Netherlands on May 9th for the launch of the Invictus Games, leaving his newborn and wife just three days after the birth. However, he had to rush back to LA for Archie's fourth birthday.
An easel statement was released without a doctor's name or signature. King Charles mentioned after the coronation that he didn't know where Archie was. Some speculate that the royal family could have revealed this information or been complicit in a cover-up. However, it is essential to consider that the royal family cannot disclose the use of a surrogate as it would violate private medical information.
In this situation, the UK government holds the authority and responsibility to ensure the eligibility of those in the line of succession. It is wise for the royal family to let the government handle this matter. Lady C hinted that something related to this might be revealed later in the year. It is reasonable to assume that government procedures and processes regarding surrogacy in the UK take time.
The surrogate couldn't provide consent to relinquish the baby until at least six weeks after the birth, thus delaying the finalization of the birth certificate. This information aligns with the reason why Harry and Meghan used a doll during Archie's first reveal. They needed him to appear older than a newborn at that time. Additionally, Archie's pictures suggested he was four months old, but he seemed bigger, possibly indicating that he was around five and a half months old.
While some people argue that surrogacy in the UK requires the baby to be adopted by Harry and Meghan, stating so on the birth certificate, it is important to consider that if they did use surrogacy, they likely opted for a closed adoption, making the certificate unavailable to the public. The birth certificate available to the public describes Harry and Meghan as the parents, but the absence of a doctor's signature is a significant detail.
Closed adoption for surrogacy makes sense as most parents would not want the surrogate to have contact with the child afterward or for the child and the public to know the surrogate's identity.
Regarding Meghan's physical appearance, some speculate about her "moon bump" and facial changes. It's worth noting that even late in her pregnancy, Meghan's face didn't appear puffy, which is typically expected post-pregnancy. Some argue that hormone injections for milk production could cause puffiness, but it's also possible she used a "butt bump" to enhance her appearance.
Most of the pictures available are from Archie's pregnancy, with fewer during Lily's pregnancy, apart from those during the Oprah interview. Even if a surrogate was involved in the second pregnancy, it's likely that Meghan learned from the previous public scrutiny and intentionally gained weight to appear puffy and pregnant during the pregnancy with Lily.
