We are closely monitoring Harry and Meghan as they face scrutiny from credible journalists who are openly sharing their experiences. The Wall Street Journal, armed with extensive insider information, has shed light on critical details that only key insiders would possess.
When such individuals turn against you and their accounts paint an unflattering picture, it may indicate that your reputation is in jeopardy and your viability compromised. These formidable voices have arrived with their figurative shovels, ready to bury the couple.
One source cautioned that the individuals who initially supported Harry and Meghan for opportunistic reasons are now distancing themselves. They are selectively disclosing snippets of information, aware that the Sussexes tend to bite the hand that feeds them and shift blame onto others for their own shortcomings.
The insider believes that these revelations are deliberate, aimed at humbling Meghan. Even their allies at TMZ have ceased their praise and benefit of the doubt, openly mocking Harry's podcast ideas and referring to them as hucksters. On a recent broadcast, even the less reputable gossip sites have joined in the mockery.
If Harry and Meghan were not apprehensive before, they should be now. While divorce speculations previously loomed, I personally never subscribed to that notion. I always believed that Meghan's narcissism and grandiose delusions disconnected her from reality, while Harry's history, trauma, and sheltered royal life left him equally estranged from reality.
These two factors fueled each other's fantasies, paranoia, and an inflated sense of self-importance, which sustained their marriage. I never envisioned their relationship unraveling until one or both of them faced a harsh reality check, likely triggered by financial constraints. At that point, they would likely engage in finger-pointing, desperately attempting to shift blame for their failures onto each other.
Their Spotify deal fell through, with Simmons publicly labeling them as grifters. Now, the gloves are off as former employees and insiders are leaking information at an alarming rate. First, there was the revelation of Harry's outlandish idea to interview Trump, Putin, Zuckerberg, and the Pope, which highlighted their detachment from reality. Now, a multitude of sources, speaking to reputable journalists at the Wall Street Journal, are divulging details from both Spotify and their foundation, Archewell. Such disclosures are bound to send Harry and Meghan, who are already prone to paranoia and control, into a genuine tailspin.
I find myself genuinely concerned about their well-being. While some may suggest that Harry can return to his family, I remain skeptical. If they are indeed facing failure and have burned their bridges, they find themselves trapped. There is nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, and both lack the humility required to offer genuine apologies. A cold-hearted expert remarked, "These are the kind of people we want removed from prominent positions in our society. We should hope and pray for their complete downfall. The alternative is horrifying. They are dangerous due to their ignorance, exploitativeness, and opportunism, particularly Meghan."
Let me clarify that expressing concern does not mean we seek to coddle them or turn a blind eye to their actions. Rather, it signifies a hope that Harry does not spiral into mental instability and cause harm to himself or others. The delusion they embody requires attention, and the cards are falling as they should. Regardless of Meghan, Harry appears to be heading towards a Britney Spears-like breakdown. The family may need to explore the idea of a healthier model of conservatorship or choose to look away. Our concern for him as fellow humans lies in the desire that he receives appropriate support and can eventually work towards making amends.
It is worth noting that the royal family tends to manage their own affairs, as exemplified by Prince Andrew's situation. Even Sarah Ferguson, despite her revelations in the Oprah interview, was still allowed to maintain a presence around the royals. In the case of Harry, there is speculation that he might return to the fold. The royals could potentially facilitate his rehabilitation by providing him with better therapy and ensuring he doesn't get involved with another individual exhibiting narcissistic traits like Meghan. In return for his silence, his expenses would be covered.
On the other hand, Meghan finds herself with limited options for support. The royals are unlikely to extend a helping hand, particularly in the presence of Charles, Camilla, William, Kate, and their children. Perhaps she could turn to her father for solace or pursue a relationship with a millionaire.
However, it is important to remain cautious and not be swayed by any apologies Harry might offer. After what he and Meghan did to the queen, their actions were unforgivable. Despite the profound loss of her husband of over 70 years and the distressing impact of the pandemic on her beloved country, they continued to disrespect the queen relentlessly.
It is highly doubtful that Harry was aware of the queen's cancer diagnosis, as both he and Meghan proved themselves untrustworthy in keeping such private information confidential, as the queen desired.
In essence, the current predicament faced by Meghan and Harry is a consequence of their own making. As the article states, they have consistently demonstrated a lack of substance, resorting to vitriolic speech and manipulation of facts regarding their royal lives. Having exhausted their family and friends as targets of their criticism, they now find themselves without anything meaningful to contribute. Their attempts often involve mimicking other successful shows and appropriating others' ideas. Their shock at the realization that actual work was required is palpable, and they cannot assign blame for their failures to anyone but themselves.
The audacity of these two individuals to sell personal information about themselves and others in the royal family, engaging in plagiarism and seeking to profit from others' work without recognition, is truly astonishing. Personally, I wouldn't offer any of my scripts to Archewell, regardless of the price. Harry and Meghan lack creativity and fail to appreciate the value of hard work. Without a work ethic, it is challenging for them to succeed.
Regarding Megan's behavior, she often demanded changes late in the editing process, sometimes involving senior Spotify executives, like then Chief Content Officer Don Ostroff, to pressure producers into making alterations. Her tendency to micromanage and employ incessant persuasion tactics to achieve her desires is apparent.
Additionally, the couple is reportedly developing a TV show for Netflix called "Bad Manners," based on the Charles Dickens character Miss Havisham from "Great Expectations." It remains uncertain whether the show will receive the green light from Netflix.
Megan's brand of empowering women and promoting strength feels somewhat limiting in terms of content production. For instance, portraying a spinster as a strong woman fighting against patriarchy seems simplistic, especially when compared to works like "Gentleman Jack," which depicted the real-life story of a woman challenging societal norms by openly living as a lesbian during an era when such relationships were not widely accepted.
Megan often confuses being bossy and in control with empowerment, which is an oversimplification. True strength in a woman involves more than simply demanding one's own way all the time. It seems she has yet to mature beyond the mindset of a 10-year-old.
