Ingrid Seward, the editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine, has shared her doubts about the removal of their titles, stating, "I don't think anything will happen to the titles because if they lose their titles, Harry is still a prince of the blood and Meghan, instead of being a Duchess of Sussex, would be Princess Henry.
That really would confuse the Americans. I think it's probably best to just leave it because it looks unkind and unnecessary." She further added that the Queen granted them the titles, so let them keep them, as they will still be known as "H" and "M" anyway.
The prospect of Meghan adopting the title "Princess Henry" has ignited debate over its potential impact. While some speculate that a title removal might be in question, the recent titles granted to their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, suggest that such a move may not be on the horizon.
Paul Burrell, a former Royal Butler with insights into the inner workings of the monarchy, cast doubt on the likelihood of the King stripping them of their titles. Burrell stated, "It's the King's decision. He does not want to light a fire underneath Harry and Meghan.
He does not want to light the blue touchpaper and watch the fireworks go off. The King is very careful, he has been very careful by handling Meghan and Harry the way he has." Burrell's insights suggest that the King may not bow to external pressures to remove the titles and is handling the situation in his own deliberate manner.
The ongoing discussion about Meghan Markle's potential new title raises questions about the future of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex within the Royal fold. As the King navigates this complex terrain, the world watches closely to see how this Royal saga unfolds.
