In a recent revelation, Aaron Korsh, the creator of the hit series 'Suits,' has shared some intriguing details from the set, shedding light on the alleged ban on Meghan Markle, who portrayed Rachel Zane, from uttering the word "poppycock" during the show. Korsh disclosed that the royal family had objected to the use of this particular word, which he found somewhat frustrating.
Prince Harry, in his memoir released this year, also touched upon the matter, mentioning that the word "poppycock" had been flagged. Aaron explained that the inclusion of this word held a personal connection for him and his family, as his in-laws used it during sensitive discussions. He expressed his excitement about incorporating it into the show.
Korsh elaborated, saying, "My wife's family, when they have a sensitive topic to discuss, they use the word 'poppycock.'" He intended to include it in an episode where Mike and Rachel would have a significant moment as a nod to his in-laws. However, the royal family did not favor its usage on the show.
While Aaron acknowledged the reasoning behind their objections, he expressed his disappointment with the decision. He shared, "They didn't want to put the word 'poppycock' in her mouth, I presume because they didn't want people cutting things together or her saying the word." Consequently, the word had to be altered to "Bull" in the script, a change that Aaron didn't particularly like, as he had promised his in-laws that "poppycock" would be featured.
Aaron revealed that there were instances during filming when the royal family offered input on what Meghan's character could say or do, though he couldn't recall the specific details. He emphasized that it wasn't Meghan herself who initiated these changes. He clarified, "No, Meghan didn't call me. I can't remember. It may have been the directing producer at the time or her agent. Whoever it was, they didn't like having to tell me any more than I liked having to hear it."
However, Aaron Korsh's account of events was disputed by former aides, who suggested that it was Meghan's agent, not the palace, that demanded the alteration. Meghan's departure from the show coincided with her relationship with Prince Harry becoming public knowledge, leading her to decide that she couldn't continue acting while in a relationship with a royal family member.
In response to these revelations, some have challenged Meghan's claims, contending that she wasn't fired, but rather given the option to continue acting. However, a former palace aide clarified that they had no recollection of scripts being vetted and proposed that it was likely an enthusiastic agent advocating for the change. The notion that the monarchy would involve itself in such script details seems implausible.
In light of these revelations, questions arise about whether Meghan's claims were aimed at using Buckingham Palace as a front to fulfill personal desires and reinforce her connection to the royal family.
