According to royal expert Daniela Elser, Africa could have been the pressure valve that could have saved the day and possibly prevented major tensions within the family. With rumors of feuds and conflicts circulating in the media, Africa might have been the perfect escape to cool things down and ease the tension.
However, Daniela goes further and suggests that Meghan might not have been on board with the plan. Shocking, right? According to her, Meghan may not have been keen on the idea of moving to Africa, focusing on conservation projects, and stepping away from the royal spotlight. Could this have been a significant factor in their eventual decision to leave the UK?
She even quotes Arthur Valentin Lowe, who believes Harry would have been happier working on conservation projects in Africa after leaving the military. However, it's clear that Meghan might not have fully embraced this vision for their future together.
Now, I don't want to jump to conclusions or spread baseless rumors, but let's address the elephant in the room. If Meghan wasn't fully on board with the Africa plan, could this have been a major point of contention between her and other members of the royal family? Did this disagreement play a part in the unraveling of their royal life?
Let me be clear here; I'm not pointing fingers at Meghan or Harry. I'm just saying that sometimes couples have different visions for their futures, and that's okay. But in the case of the royal family, such differences might have had severe consequences.
