Let's start with a dress that didn't quite fit Charlotte. She was the unsuspecting victim of Meghan's alleged cruelty. Her ill-fitted and frayed dress was just the beginning. The children were even forbidden from wearing tights or socks, leaving them exposed to the elements. Shocking, right? Ivy, the daughter of Jessica and a friend of Meghan's, dared to wear a different headpiece. Clearly, Meghan's reign extends even to the choice of headgear.
And then there's the infamous wedding portrait that tells a thousand tales. Princess Charlotte wasn't seated on the floor with the other bridesmaids but protectively nestled on Catherine's lap. Prince George was relegated to a chair next to his mother, looking like he's being shielded from the alleged evil force that is Meghan Markle. Even Catherine's smile appeared more awkward than a cat in a tutu.
But the shocker is Sophie Carter, a close friend of Catherine's and a godmother to Charlotte, who reportedly witnessed the alleged bullying firsthand. They say kids are like truth-tellers, revealing more than words ever could. Sophie Carter seems to tell a story of Charlotte and George's discomfort and unease in the presence of the alleged bully, Meghan.
It's like something out of a thriller, a tale of Meghan's excessive actions with these innocent young royals. A tale corroborated by a series of conveniently timed stories about their supposed misbehavior. It's as if the universe is urging them to unveil the truth, a truth that paints a picture of Meghan's behavior behind palace doors.
And let's not forget the chaotic scenes during rehearsals, with misbehaving kids supposedly so disruptive that Kate and other mothers were called in to calm the chaos. During the wedding itself, Charlotte and George were notably absent from the ceremony, sparking speculations about their limited participation. Was it a strategy to minimize their exposure to Meghan, the alleged puppet master?
As the puzzle pieces fall into place, the truth remains shrouded in whispers and shadows. Are Meghan's actions merely those of a misunderstood duchess, or is there a darker side to the royal facade?
