Previously, the couple had visited Liberty Village, a transition hub for 11,000 refugees, and made donations to four charities focused on assisting Afghan families. However, there were concerns about the wording of the announcement, which made it sound as if Meghan herself had directly aided 11,000 refugees and donated to four charities.
Some believed that the couple's monetary donations lacked transparency and that they frequently partnered with organizations without initiating their own projects. Following the post about the political project with Mina's List, an announcement regarding Archewell's contribution of feminine hygiene products to Gienko was made. Interestingly, this announcement coincided with the removal of the post about the political project.
Mina's List subsequently denied Meghan's cooperation and contributions, leading Archewell to delete its announcement. Notably, Mina's List's website did not mention any collaboration with Archewell. Some critics questioned Meghan and Harry's involvement in political causes, suggesting that they lacked the necessary experience and resources.
They also referenced a previous incident where the couple purchased a Kennedy award for themselves but reportedly showed little engagement with the event's attendees.
Amid these developments, concerns were raised about Harry and Meghan's perception in Hollywood. Some argued that Hollywood values success above all else and that titles were of little consequence. The couple's recent public appearances, particularly at the Invictus Games, were criticized for overshadowing the event's intended focus on honoring deserving service members.
It was emphasized that the couple needed to improve their public image, as their behavior had made them appear unpredictable, bitter, and untrustworthy. The suggestion for Harry, as he approached his 40th year, was to seek creative avenues for achieving his goals and to strive for improvement in their public relations efforts.
