Meghan Markle's Outrage: Wounded Warriors Reveal No Funding for 2022 Games, Allegations of Sussexes Keeping All Funds

Prince Harry has faced criticism for his treatment of veterans in the context of his documentary series, "Invictus." These allegations were recently brought to light by The Telegraph, where the author scrutinized the content and direction of the series. One of the central criticisms is that "Invictus" seems to attempt to serve two distinct purposes simultaneously. The author points out that Harry and Meghan have become brands in their own right, and their participation is a major draw for the series.

However, this dual focus has led to accusations that the couple has made the show more about themselves than about the Invictus Games it was meant to showcase. The author argues that despite containing emotional insights into the struggles of veterans, the series often shifts the spotlight away from the veterans' stories to the personal revelations of Prince Harry, including his experiences while isolated at Buckingham Palace.

Meanwhile, concerns have emerged regarding the treatment of the Wounded Warriors involved in the 2022 games. Reports suggest that these athletes have not received any financial benefits or compensation for their participation, while Harry appears to take credit for the project. Some have called upon Harry to acknowledge the contributions of Kate and William, who have been involved in supporting veterans.

Harry is listed as an executive producer of the series, produced alongside his and Meghan's Archewell Productions. The film itself is directed by Orlando van Edel and produced by Joe Natza, known for their Academy Award-winning short film "The White Helmets." Interestingly, Harry is the only actor explicitly listed in the credits, with many of the athletes and veterans involved in the film feeling overlooked and uncredited.

This lack of transparency has raised questions about the purpose of the documentary series and the treatment of the athletes. Some argue that the veterans should be compensated for their participation, while others express disappointment in the overshadowing of their stories by Prince Harry's involvement.

In essence, the controversy revolves around whether the documentary truly serves the purpose of shedding light on the Invictus Games and the veterans it represents or whether it primarily promotes Prince Harry's image. The source of funding for the documentary, believed to be Netflix, has also raised questions about the allocation of funds related to the Invictus Games.

Ultimately, these developments have led to calls for greater clarity and recognition of the contributions of the athletes and veterans who are at the heart of the Invictus Games. The concern is that the focus has shifted away from the individuals who have overcome injuries and served their countries, making it essential to reevaluate the priorities of the documentary and the games themselves.