Rumors circulating suggest that the Duchess of Sussex had a strong desire to arrange a meeting between her daughter and the Queen before Her Majesty's passing. Meghan purportedly aimed to capture this significant encounter on camera, either as a photograph or video, before Queen Elizabeth's final moments.
However, it appears that her wish went unfulfilled. The Queen reportedly had concerns about how professional photographers might exploit this meeting, potentially sharing the images with television networks. Consequently, the Sussexes were not allowed to take iPhone pictures for private use.
Prior to this incident, the Sussexes were also prohibited from bringing Netflix cameras to document the Jubilee weekend for a documentary, as outlined in the Sandringham Agreement they signed as part of their departure from their roles as senior working Royals.
Controversy surrounds Omid Scobie's new book, as its very first chapter delves into the late Queen Elizabeth's passing, titled somewhat anonymously as "Elizabeth the Second's Final Days." This choice of title has raised questions, especially considering Scobie's longstanding support for Meghan. Notably, he had previously characterized the late Queen as "cold-blooded" for her refusal to grant Meghan a private meeting during a crucial period.
Scobie's comment inadvertently hinted at the Sussexes' intentions regarding the late Queen, including their apparent lack of interest in visiting her while she was alive, despite her numerous invitations to spend time with them and her great-grandchildren. Even during the Queen's ailing health, Harry and Meghan repeatedly declined her invitations to visit.
Furthermore, suspicions have arisen about the Sussexes' potential interest in commercializing aspects of their relationship with the late Queen, possibly even her passing. Some have suggested that Meghan may have secretly wanted to film or record the Queen's passing, possibly using hidden recording devices for future use, whether in a book, a Netflix documentary, or for other undisclosed purposes.
Recent accusations against Meghan Markle and Prince Harry also concern their carbon emissions during their trip to Europe. Despite their vocal advocacy for climate change awareness, the couple faced criticism for their carbon footprint resulting from flights to various destinations. Royal expert Richard Fitz William pointed out the apparent inconsistency between their climate change preaching and their actions. He highlighted past instances where the couple's travel choices seemed at odds with their environmental concerns.
In 2019, Prince Harry had pledged to have only two children due to climate change concerns, and in 2021, the Sussexes pledged to be carbon neutral by 2030 via their Archewell Foundation. Fitz William noted that while some flights may be necessary for work or leisure, questions arise when it comes to the necessity of each flight and whether more sustainable options were available and not pursued.
Ultimately, the allegations surrounding Meghan and Harry's behavior and intentions have raised questions about their consistency in aligning their actions with their public statements and commitments, adding to the ongoing scrutiny of their actions and choices.
