For those seeking a deeper understanding, I highly recommend Tom Bauer's book, 'Revenge,' although it does lean favorably towards the royalty perspective. If that doesn't align with your views, perhaps it's best to skip it. However, it does shed light on some significant events and raises questions about the veracity of Megan's accusations, particularly concerning racism.
Now, let's be equitable here; the royal family hasn't remained untouched by the shadow of racism. Even the late Prince Philip, may he rest in peace, made some public statements that hinted at potential racism behind closed doors.
But it's essential to note that harboring personal biases doesn't necessarily equate to hatred. It's a product of one's generation. I firmly believe there's no substantial evidence of racism directed at Megan by the royal family. Well-researched books provide a nuanced perspective on Megan and Harry's past choices.
What I find truly intolerable is dishonesty. Evidence points towards Megan fabricating her experiences to paint herself as a better person and a victim while vilifying the royal family. She sought the privileges of royalty without the associated responsibilities, neglecting charitable endeavors. Megan Markle is undeniably ambitious, but her actions lean toward self-interest rather than humanitarianism. She's a compulsive liar, and her mistreatment extends even to her own family. While it's uncertain how much they contributed to the situation, Megan's reluctance to engage in introspection hampers growth. She refuses to acknowledge wrongdoing, something intrinsic to human nature—we all make mistakes.
Megan and Harry had expressed a desire for privacy and escape from media scrutiny, but they've consistently placed themselves in the public eye for financial gain, despite humiliating and embarrassing their families. People find this behavior distasteful, especially when former employees and old friends contradict their accounts. Hence, I don't see Megan as a mere victim of the media or a coordinated smear campaign. Not all negative reports about her are unfounded. It seems Megan's supporters are eager to shift blame elsewhere rather than hold her accountable.
I haven't encountered any compelling evidence suggesting a vast conspiracy to harm Megan and Harry, other than their own claims. They might have felt vulnerable when their publicly funded security was reduced or when involved in a car accident, although there's no substantiation for such incidents. The recurring pattern here isn't bias; it's Megan and Harry's modus operandi—tell a lie and hope others spread it. Megan's history of falsehoods dates back to her childhood, like the infamous dish soap commercial story. Megan's readiness to invent falsehoods has culminated in spreading damaging rumors about others, such as the fabricated affair between William and Rose, which was later traced back to a social event involving Megan and Harry.
Megan's penchant for sensationalism and a penchant for negativity isn't garnering the attention she desires. Despite employing PR firms to plant stories in the media, her endeavors remain uninteresting to most, except Megan herself. Her attempts to monetize her notoriety, fueled by the flying monkeys who do her bidding, reveal a fundamental truth—Megan and Harry's strategy centers on disseminating falsehoods. Do you agree with my perspective? Let's continue this discussion.
As always, we'll address the recent points made in the video titled 'Sad Truth: Megan and Harry Beg to Attend Kevin Costner's Event.' Aquarius, you remind us that most people don't care about the harkles, and you're absolutely right. Connie, I share your sentiments about Kevin and his discomfort. Linda, Harry's prolonged association with Megan indeed damages his reputation. Elizabeth, Megan's coat does resemble a horse blanket, doesn't it? Kaz, the Costners probably find amusement in Megan and Harry's antics. Yina, you might be onto something with the recording device theory.
Casper, the horse blanket resemblance is hard to ignore. Cheryl, you've got a point about Harry's appearance. Claire, the SpongeBob SquarePants analogy is strangely accurate. Ralph, Lady C's statements do seem to waver. Kitty Fan, you've touched on the mysterious belts Megan wears. Norma, your comments about Harry's treatment of horses are disturbingly plausible. Kitty Fan, Megan's lack of empathy is indeed a concerning trait. Veronica, while we shouldn't insult orangutans, your observation isn't entirely off-base. Kitty Fan, your insight into Harry and polo ponies is spot-on.
