Do you remember the Sussex PR department's article from the Jubilee year that claimed Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles had met the artificial child, Anon? Well, this story seems to be made up, just like many others Meghan Markle herself has planted. The only image of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip holding baby Archie after his birth is one that has been obviously photoshopped.
The supposed arrival of the invisible children during the Queen's Jubilee weekend adds another layer to the intrigue. Every member of the royal family had a hectic weekend filled with official engagements across the UK's four nations, making it an improbable time for a birthday celebration.
Why couldn't they have visited at a more convenient time? This was one of the busiest royal weekends in years, leaving no room for such a visit. It's evident that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry orchestrated this deliberately to create yet another web of deception.
Queen Elizabeth was even forced to cancel some of her Jubilee events, such as the church service of Thanksgiving, a concert, and the Beacon Lighting ceremony, due to her discomfort and pain from bone cancer. It's preposterous to think that she would forgo these significant events to play with a one-year-old on the floor.
The whole birthday party scenario was entirely fictional, and it was designed to portray the royal family in a negative light, insinuating that they declined to attend Lily's party. In reality, the royal family was preoccupied that day, with most members out of town. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry planned it that way, intentionally.
While I respect a parent's right to maintain privacy regarding their children, what vexes me about Meghan Markle and Prince Harry is their penchant for teasing the public with obscure images of their children. They either need to share photos of the kids or keep them out of the public eye entirely. This applies to other royal family members who employ similar tactics. These partial glimpses of their children seem like an attempt to toy with the public's curiosity.
Furthermore, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's posts never explicitly confirm that the children in the photos are Archie and Lily. They seem to assume that the public will make that connection, which is rather peculiar. It's intriguing that while they are addicted to media attention, they rarely showcase their children, and the kids are absent from their vacations.
Even the documentation for their private plane to the Jubilee service confirmed the absence of children. Airport employees noted the absence of child-related items. If the children were indeed there, Meghan Markle would have shared photos of them everywhere.
So, let's set the record straight: Charles never met Lily, the Queen never met Lily, and no one else met Lily because there's no evidence to suggest she even exists. Meghan Markle's story about the Queen playing on the floor with Lily is preposterous, given the Queen's age and health condition. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have also been caught photoshopping themselves into pictures with their "invisible" children, casting doubt on the entire narrative.
It's telling that the royal family has not released any official photos of these children, in stark contrast to other royals who regularly share family portraits. It's a complicated issue, indeed. Now, I'll let you continue discussing the invisible children in the comments section.
Turning to your previous video's comments titled "Worldwide Privacy Tour Hits Atlanta: Sussex Back on US Soil After Romantic Getaway," it's evident that Meghan Markle Markle's popularity continues to decline. Many express their disbelief at her self-image and question her actions.
People eagerly await the moment when Prince William and Princess Catherine ascend to the throne, providing the privacy Meghan Markle so ardently desires. Some even speculate about her real financiers and the source of funds for her PR campaigns.
The efforts Meghan Markle makes to keep up her public persona seem futile as her popularity dwindles. Many people are dubious of her motives as a result of the way she presents herself as a humanitarian and her relentless quest for media attention. The public seems to be less interested in her endeavours as she gets closer to 50, and her attempts to stay in the public eye become more obvious.
