The source claims that a few months before the Sussexes were highlighted in the November issue of Byline Times, a number of well-known persons connected to the Sussex Squad were participating in fundraising initiatives for the journal.
It's not limited to Meghan's squad; other parties with their own agendas against the Royal Family have also been actively contributing to these campaigns. The fundraising base appears to have notably diminished compared to the previous year, with a smaller number of supporters and allegations of bot farm accounts participating in the funding efforts.
The Sussex Squad appeared to be actively sharing 11-page documents with Byline Times to provide information, indicating a coordinated effort. The tabloid's collaboration with Meghan and Harry has raised questions about their involvement and influence in the publication's content.
Byline Times, a British newspaper and website, gained prominence during the Meghan and Harry era, with strong support from fans of the couple, including individuals like Sarah, who made a fundraising appeal on Twitter. Sarah reported that the Sussex Squad had contributed around £1,000 of the £1,130 raised for Byline Times in just 24 hours. It's a development that has raised suspicions about the publication's connection to the Sussexes and their potential stake in Byline Media.
In 2021, Meghan and Harry used Oprah's platform for their high-profile interview, which many considered a "hit job" on the Royal Family. In 2023, the couple's association with Byline Times has drawn comparisons, with some suggesting a recurring pattern of strategy. Lady C's information revealed that Byline Times aimed to boost hard copy sales, shifting from an online-only presence.
There were allegations that Meghan and Harry had employed a convicted hacker, Dan Evans, to defame the Royal Family in collaboration with Byline Times. Notably, Dan Evans had previously been involved with Prince Harry's legal team in a case against Mirror Group Newspapers earlier in the year.
A new report by Byline Times has alleged that a cash-for-leak scheme triggered a rift within the Royal Family, further suggesting that the family benefited from slanderous stories about Meghan Markle. The report mentioned that King Charles was concerned about Harry and Meghan overshadowing him and the rest of the family in the media. However, these allegations have been debunked, and it was emphasized that the Royal Family had no such intentions. The article also highlighted the significant differences between the Sussexes and the rest of the family.
Despite the allegations and controversies, it's clear that the Royal Family does not fear being overshadowed by Meghan and Harry, as they operate in entirely different spheres. The Royal Family's priorities and public service work differ significantly from the Sussexes' activities.
In the United States, there's a growing sentiment that Meghan and Harry's presence is not welcomed, with many Americans expressing weariness of their actions and antics. While discussing California's ongoing challenges, it was humorously suggested that these problems were not solely due to the Sussexes' relocation. In response, it was pointed out that Americans are not inclined to have a favorable view of Meghan and Harry's actions, and the sentiment leans towards sending them back to the UK.
