He explained that Scobie doesn't directly communicate with Meghan but talks to a press intermediary. Bower emphasized that Scobie's current book doesn't bring anything new to the table, describing his stories as trivial, such as claims about King Charles tying his shoelaces. Bower contended that Meghan Markle's writing style is discernible in the book because the claims about Kate in the book mirror Meghan's previous statements and criticisms of Kate. Bower expressed his frustration with Scobie's attack on Kate, branding it as gratuitous, but he believed it was a reflection of Meghan's perspective.
Bower remarked that Scobie has now written two books, both of which reflect Meghan's voice, and they lack remarkable revelations. He pointed out that Scobie serves as a tool for the Sussexes and that his efforts appear to tarnish the royal family's reputation. Camila agreed, highlighting how the book portrays Kate as a Stepford Wife with limited utility, a depiction she deemed unfair. She praised Kate for her contributions and stated that Scobie's attacks seemed to be aimed at grabbing headlines.
Many Royal experts have criticized Scobie's attacks on the 41-year-old mother of three, deeming them unjust and unwarranted. Some have accused him of attempting to gain favor with Harry and Meghan. Fellow biographer Robert Jobson called Scobie's actions disgraceful, asserting that his character assassination of Princess Kate is unfounded and harmful. He questioned Scobie's motives behind such claims and expressed admiration for Kate's dedication to her duties and family. Jobson believed that Kate should be respected for her service rather than denigrated.
In essence, many experts have voiced their disapproval of Scobie's writings, finding them to be unjust and unkind toward Princess Kate and questioning Scobie's intentions behind such narratives.
