During her inaugural visit in January 2020, JFG presented Markle with a gold and diamond pendant, a donation from the local jeweler Holly Bartlett, an esteemed Hila Tribe member. Co-director of JFG, Zoe Craig Sparrow, commented on the Duchess's comfort and ease during her visit. However, during her 2023 visit, Meghan chose not to wear the custom-made gold necklace, opting for alternative jewelry instead. This decision sparked speculation about the pendant's whereabouts and raised questions about her commitment to feminist principles.
Analogies have been drawn between this incident and one where Catherine wore earrings presented by a bereaved mother on Mental Health Day, highlighting the potential offense Meghan's apparent disregard for this important piece could cause to the indigenous jeweler and the girls involved. Additionally, Meghan's potential disregard for the indigenous partners at the upcoming Invictus Games in 2025 has raised concerns.
It's worth noting that instead of showcasing her engagement jewelry, Meghan displayed a pink diamond ring during her visit. Detractors argue that she would have understood the significance of wearing jewelry and accessories procured or bestowed by the visited locals had she worked more closely with the late Queen and Royal staff. This is seen as a potent diplomatic gesture, as exemplified by the late Queen, Prince Philip, their children, spouses, and descendants, who often engage in such practices to foster diplomatic ties.
Regarding Meghan's long-term commitment to the organization, skepticism pervades the narrative, with allegations that she may not be deeply involved in significant work in the United States and that such visits serve more as photo opportunities than substantive engagement. This approach starkly contrasts with the Royal Family's customary practice of using fashion and accessories to convey esteem and foster diplomatic ties.
Meanwhile, Meghan Markle faces criticism that she is caught in a cycle of diminishing returns. Experts have recently started discussing Meghan Markle's unofficial spokesperson, Elet Scobey. These claims were brought to light by commentator Matthew Lassa during a candid interview with GB News. Lassa expressed concerns about Megan possibly briefing Scobey with stories against the Royal Family, stating that it appears somewhat desperate.
He also noted that with Royal biographies, there's usually one that makes a big impact, but then they tend to lose steam with subsequent releases. Meghan's unofficial spokesperson, Elet Scobey, is set to release a book titled "End Game," promising an in-depth investigation into the current state of the British Monarchy, including an unpopular king, a power-hungry heir, a queen willing to go to great lengths to preserve her image, and a prince forced to start a new life after feeling betrayed by his own family.
