The Dutch version of the book pointed fingers at King Charles, a claim still shrouded in ambiguity. This is precisely the kind of mess that a memoir could potentially clarify. But even before the ink on the pages could dry, Scobie hinted that Meghan might not have the level of candidness required for such an endeavor. In Scobie's own words, he explained that to gain the respect of the reader, one must be completely human in their portrayal and transparent in their self-representation. He added that a memoir must be candid, even embarrassing at times, to provide a true portrait of a human being. However, he appeared skeptical about Meghan's ability to achieve this level of authenticity, implying that her image is highly curated.
Now, let's shift our focus to Harry's book, "Spare," which made waves in the literary world, becoming the fastest-selling non-fiction book in history. However, this success was accompanied by some criticism and a noticeable decline in Harry and Meghan's popularity in the US. Comedian Chris Rock humorously questioned Meghan's claims of racism, suggesting that even black people were curious about the baby's skin tone. This sentiment echoed the skepticism many had towards the couple's narrative.
Scobie, defending Harry's memoir, explained that Harry's perspective was naturally different, as he was writing to defend and protect someone he deeply cares about. He also clarified that expecting absolute balance and unbiased takes in a memoir is unrealistic, as it's a personal account, not a piece of journalism.
Returning to Meghan's bombshell claims during the Oprah interview, where she alleged that an unnamed royal expressed concerns about her child's skin tone, Harry later suggested that the comments might have stemmed from curiosity rather than genuine concern. This sparked a wave of confusion and debate. "End Game," the controversial book in question, even hinted that Charles wrote Meghan a letter post-Oprah, stating there was no ill will or malice intended in the alleged comment. However, the royals have remained tight-lipped about the accuracy of the names published.
