According to the disputed royal author, there is a "translation error" about the names mentioned in the Dutch volumes. On the next course of action for the royal family, however, Buckingham Palace is rumoured to be conferring with top advisors during the coming week. According to renowned royal historian Richard Fitzwilliams, "the Sussexes' silence is the elephant in the room." The "mouthpiece" of the Sussexes generates a stir as identities are revealed, he said in a tweet criticising the couple's "totally unsatisfactory" silence. They have not stopped talking. Definitely hypocrisy?
Harry and Meghan urged to end 'deafening silence' and defend Charles https://t.co/9VpAAbrCci via @MailOnline this is totally unsatisfactory. The “mouthpiece” of the Sussexes causes a sensation as names are leaked. They are still silent. Hypocrisy surely?
— Richard Fitzwilliams (@RFitzwilliams) December 2, 2023
"When will we hear from the Sussexes?"
"The grotesque Scobie 'error' has become a bizarre farce which will have detrimental consequences for the RF (Royal Family)," the royal expert went on.
"They have previously prevailed in court.
"Every action they do gives this poison oxygen; if they take no action, it will persist. Not a word from the Sussexes. This is also relevant. Courtiers are frequently seen without faces. I have the utmost sympathy for them because of the deceitful Sussexes, the blustery Omid Scobie, and a world that is constantly hungry for royal gossip."
The grotesque Scobie “error” has become a bizarre farce which will have damaging consequences for the RF. They have won legal cases before. Anything they do gives oxygen to this poison, to do nothing means it sticks. The Sussexes are silent. This speaks too.
— Richard Fitzwilliams (@RFitzwilliams) December 2, 2023
But according to the Telegraph, insiders close to Harry and Meghan have argued that she "never intended for them to be publicly identified." These sources supposedly jotted down the identities of the two family members in letters to King Charles.
