According to a sensational report published by The New York Times, Meghan Markle is purported to have conspired with Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State known for his controversial history, including allegations of war crimes. The reported intent behind this alleged conspiracy was to prematurely disclose the news of the Queen's passing to the American public. Such a move appeared to disregard established Royal protocol and the dignity traditionally associated with the monarchy.
The report suggests that Meghan Markle, who was in the UK alongside her husband, Prince Harry, to attend the Well Child Awards, received an early morning phone call from Henry Kissinger on September 8th. During this call, Kissinger conveyed the news that Queen Elizabeth had peacefully passed away in her sleep at Windsor Castle. Kissinger's access to this information was attributed to his long-standing friendship and advisory role with the Queen, providing him with confidential details through his contacts within the Royal household.
Rather than respecting the wishes of the royal family, who had intended to keep the news private until they could inform the Commonwealth and world leaders, Meghan Markle allegedly chose to capitalize on the situation for personal gain. It is reported that she reached out to The New York Times and granted them an exclusive interview. In this interview, she expressed her grief and admiration for the late Queen while simultaneously using the platform to promote her own projects and causes.
The publication of the interview online at 10:45 a.m., a mere 15 minutes before Buckingham Palace's official announcement of the Queen's passing, triggered a significant outcry and indignation among the British public and the royal family. Many felt betrayed and disrespected by Meghan Markle's actions, leading to accusations of betrayal, dishonesty, and narcissism. This incident exposed deep divisions and tensions within the royal family and raised significant questions about Meghan Markle's motives and actions.
In this narrative, Meghan Markle emerges as a person driven by personal ambition, willing to manipulate sensitive situations for her own benefit, even at the expense of those who had welcomed and supported her. It paints a picture of her as a calculated and potentially divisive individual. On the other hand, Henry Kissinger, a controversial and influential figure in global diplomacy, is known for his realist and pragmatic approach to international relations, despite facing accusations of war crimes, human rights violations, and conspiracy from numerous critics and victims.
The New York Times' report on Meghan Markle's alleged involvement in the Queen's death leak has raised profound questions about her actions and motivations during a pivotal moment in history. The repercussions of this revelation continue to resonate, exposing fractures within the royal family and shedding light on the controversial legacy of Henry Kissinger.
