Type Here to Get Search Results !

NYT Presents Evidence of Meghan Markle's Collusion with Kissinger to Leak QE's Death: Handcuffs Await!

NYT Presents Evidence of Meghan Markle's Collusion with Kissinger to Leak QE's Death: Handcuffs Await!

The New York Times (NYT) has presented compelling evidence suggesting that Meghan Markle colluded with Henry Kissinger to leak the news of Queen Elizabeth's death to the media. The news of Queen Elizabeth's passing on September 8th, 2022, marked a momentous event in history, triggering worldwide mourning, particularly in the United Kingdom, where she held the record for being the longest-reigning monarch. Amidst the solemnity of the moment, shocking allegations surfaced regarding Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, and her alleged involvement in leaking the news of the Queen's death to the U.S. media before the official announcement.

 According to an explosive report by The New York Times, Meghan Markle is said to have conspired with Henry Kissinger, the former U.S. Secretary of State with a controversial history, including allegations of war crimes. The purported intent behind this alleged conspiracy was to break the news of the Queen's passing to the American public, a move that appeared to disregard established Royal protocol and the dignity of the monarchy. The report suggests that Meghan Markle, who was in the UK alongside her husband Prince Harry to attend the Well Child Awards, received an early morning phone call from Henry Kissinger on September 8th. During this call, Kissinger relayed the news that Queen Elizabeth had peacefully passed away in her sleep at Windsor Castle.

Kissinger had access to this information due to his long-standing friendship and advisory role with the Queen, which granted him access to confidential details through his contacts within the Royal household. Instead of honoring the wishes of the royal family, who sought to keep the news private until they could inform the Commonwealth and world leaders, Meghan Markle allegedly chose to capitalize on the situation for personal gain.

Reportedly, she reached out to The New York Times and granted them an exclusive interview. In this interview, she expressed her grief and admiration for the late Queen while simultaneously promoting her own projects and causes. The interview was published online at 10:45 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time, 15 minutes before Buckingham Palace's official announcement of the Queen's passing.

This sequence of events generated significant outcry and indignation among the British public and the royal family. Many felt betrayed and disrespected by Meghan Markle's actions, leading to accusations of betrayal, dishonesty, and narcissism. The incident exposed deep divisions and tensions within the royal family and raised questions about Meghan Markle's motives and actions.

In this narrative, Meghan Markle emerges as a person driven by personal ambition, willing to manipulate sensitive situations to her own advantage, even at the expense of those who had welcomed and supported her. It paints a picture of her as a calculated and potentially dangerous individual. On the other hand, Henry Kissinger is portrayed as a controversial and influential figure in global diplomacy, known for his realist and pragmatic approach to international relations.

Despite receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 for his role in ending the Vietnam War, he also faced accusations of war crimes, human rights violations, and conspiracy from numerous critics and victims. The New York Times report on Meghan Markle's alleged involvement in the Queen's death leak has raised profound questions about her actions and motivations during a pivotal moment in history.

The repercussions of this revelation continue to reverberate, exposing fractures within the royal family and shedding light on the controversial legacy of Henry Kissinger.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.