In an op-ed for the New York Post, the outspoken journalist expressed his belief that more punitive measures should be taken against individuals who claim to despise the monarchy yet eagerly leverage their royal titles for personal gain. Morgan did not mince words, referring to the couple as "traitor rats" and expressing his disbelief over allegations of racist comments made within the family. Morgan's latest article received substantial support, particularly from American readers who expressed deep concerns about the future of the British monarchy.
Some suggested that it would be beneficial for the UK if Prince Harry, Meghan, and their children were to lose their titles, asserting that such a move would prioritize the health and safety of the country and the monarchy. One American Royal enthusiast remarked that the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh had surpassed the late Duke and Duchess of Windsor to become the most controversial royal family in recent memory.
Earlier this week, Prime Minister Cel announced his intention to introduce a bill in Westminster aimed at amending a law passed during World War I, which stripped German nobles of their British titles. Cel, who clarified his support for the monarchy despite these proposed changes, believes that Parliament and the Privy Council should consider the "nuclear option." Under the Impeachment Amendment Act of 1917, the Privy Council has the authority to recommend the impeachment of crown members through a parliamentary vote.
Sources close to the Sussexes have confirmed that Prince Harry and Meghan do not endorse the claims made in Omid Scobie's book. However, skepticism abounds, with few believing this denial.
