In response, emissaries from the Sussex faction approached TMZ, vehemently refuting these assertions and clarifying that Archewell, devoid of corporate status, cannot feasibly operate in financial deficit. Kinsey Schofield, an analyst conversant in royal and entertainment matters, speaking to GB News, conveyed that these allegations are exacerbating tensions within the royal pair. Schofield further insinuated that their engagement with the Foundation is purportedly limited to a solitary day per week. The Archewell website showcases a visual compendium of their yearly endeavors. The foundation's digital manifesto proclaims: "Our mission is both elementary and profound - to be present and effectuate benevolence."
In her commentary on the Sussexes' engagement with Archewell, Schofield remarked: "Imagine the luxury of a one-day workweek? The financial trajectories of Harry and Meghan within the Archewell context remain nebulous, notwithstanding their commendable involvement with Invictus - a project born from the collaborative efforts of the Royal Family and the Palace."
She disclosed: "The inception of Invictus was not a solitary endeavor by Harry, but a collective effort. Conversely, Archewell's modus operandi often involves aligning with pre-existing, efficacious charities and then seeking acknowledgment for shared ventures."
Schofield elaborated on GB News: "Archewell's strategy appears to be minimal involvement, piggybacking on charities already in motion. This epitomizes the quintessential Harry and Meghan approach, reminiscent of their Spotify endeavors - minimal exertion, maximum visibility."
Finally, addressing the paltry sum of two donations to Archewell, Patrick opined: "Considering their stature and the platforms they possess, it's lamentable that their fundraising efforts are so lackluster. In stark contrast, even a modest street collection by us might rival their financial accomplishments, which is nothing short of a disgrace."
