In his memoir, titled "Spare," Harry recounts a pivotal moment when he urged Meghan not to take a photograph in front of India's iconic landmark, the Taj Mahal, during her humanitarian visit to the country. His rationale? He wanted to avoid any perception that Meghan was trying to emulate his beloved mother, Princess Diana. The iconic image of Diana sitting alone on a bench at the Taj Mahal had become synonymous with the strain in her marriage to Prince Charles.
Harry vividly remembers telling Meghan, "Do not take a photo in front of the Taj Mahal." His reasoning was grounded in the haunting memory of his mother's solo picture at that very spot, an image that had left an indelible mark on the world's collective memory. He passionately explained to Meghan that he didn't want anyone to misconstrue her intentions as an attempt to recreate Diana's iconic moment. Meghan, genuinely perplexed, questioned the significance of this cautionary tale. She had never heard of the photo, and Harry found solace in her genuine bewilderment, noting, "Meg had never heard of this photo, and found the whole thing baffling, and I loved her for being baffled."
Now, let's shift our focus back to 1992 when Princess Diana, already living separately from Prince Charles, posed on that very bench at the Taj Mahal. This image became emblematic of a marriage in turmoil, and the couple formally announced their separation ten months later. Fast forward to 2016, when Prince William and Kate Middleton visited the Taj Mahal and decided to sit on the same bench. Despite assertions that this decision wasn't an intentional replication of Diana's moment, the symbolism was hard to ignore. The bench has since become a tourist attraction, drawing up to 25,000 visitors daily. An aide clarified that William and Kate's choice wasn't an intentional mimicry of Diana's moment, yet the association lingered worldwide.
In the rich tapestry of royal history, Harry's warning stands as a testament to his unwavering commitment to preserving his mother's legacy. Meghan's potential disregard for this caution raises questions about her grasp of the intricacies within the royal family's complex dynamics.
