Another individual, claiming over a decade of experience in aviation, disputed Prince Harry's pilot credentials based on his attitude and reported substance abuse issues. They went on to mention that Harry failed the exams to become a helicopter pilot, questioning his qualifications. A third person added that he has never been a pilot or a gunner, and Harry likely got into Sandhurst due to his royal status rather than on merit.
Some commentators cringed at what they perceived as Harry elbowing his way into an awards ceremony, acting as if he were a qualified pilot deserving of recognition. Others wrote to the organizers, requesting Harry's removal from the award, citing concerns about his military service. They criticized the short duration of his tours, with the first one reduced to eight weeks due to media exposure. There were accusations that his presence at Camp Bastion during the second tour led to a Taliban attack, resulting in casualties. Additionally, doubts were raised about Harry's role as a Gunner and his qualifications to fly solo.
The argument continued, emphasizing Prince William's qualifications as a fully qualified helicopter pilot in the RAF, highlighting that he doesn't need induction into a living legend award. Prince William was contrasted with Harry, who allegedly purchased the award as an ego booster after being omitted from Sandhurst's book of notable students. Criticism was directed at Harry's book "Spare," particularly a statement about not losing sleep after downing enemies, leading to public denouncement by former military commanders. In contrast, Prince William's achievements were portrayed more positively, with his inclusion in the Su Hurst book of Living Legends.
