But let's keep it real here – the Queen is one of the most respected women in history, and these two thought they could drag her childhood name into the PR circus without batting an eyelash. That's next-level entitlement, my friends. As Kevin rightly pointed out, they were trying to pull a fast one on the public, making us believe they're still tight with the Royals and that the Queen adores them. But spoiler alert – that's not the case. Naming your kid after your grandma's private nickname without her say-so? That's just straight-up tacky, no class whatsoever.
But this is par for the course with Harry and Meghan. Everything, and I mean everything, is calculated for media attention and, let's not forget, the almighty dollar. They wanted that royal christening at Windsor Castle to sell to Netflix, and they wanted the Queen's nickname to flaunt their supposed closeness. It's all a game for them.
And when they got called out for their tacky move, what did they do? Threw around legal threats like bullies on the playground because how dare anyone imply the Queen wasn't overjoyed to have her childhood name exploited for their PR games. Maybe, just maybe, if they had the decency to ask for permission before the big announcement, we wouldn't be in this mess. Alas, that's not how these two operate.
At the end of the day, this whole name fiasco was just another self-serving move from the runaway royals. They wanted the perceived prestige without showing an ounce of respect. As Kevin aptly put it, extremely tacky. But honestly, should we expect anything else from these two? They've got a track record of using the Queen's name and traditions for their own benefit, whether it's cropping up in PR photos at the Jubilee she explicitly banned them from or now latching onto her childhood nickname.
