Meghan claims she wants her children to live normal lives, yet her actions suggest otherwise. Archie and Lilibet are not shielded from the public eye out of genuine concern for their well-being. They're being used as pawns in a game against the royal family, and to add to the intrigue, we still don't have concrete proof of their existence – ghost kids, as I like to call them, mysteriously absent from the public eye.
Russell points out that Prince Harry, like his brother William, is concerned about privacy but takes it a step further by being suspicious of privacy violations. It's laughable. Prince William rightly protects his children's privacy while introducing them to royal life. In contrast, Prince Harry expresses concerns about his children being in the public eye. Is it genuine concern or a carefully crafted strategy?
Now, let's talk about the Archewell Foundation, touted as a beacon of change and philanthropy. Recent revelations paint a different picture. Meghan and Harry, who claim to be devoted to their foundation, each put in an average of just one hour per week this year – a mere 1 hour. Their foundation suffered a whopping £5,363,357 loss, and detailed financial documents reveal that only two donors contributed a significant amount, far from the £7.1 million profit in 2021.
The poor press surrounding the Archewell Foundation isn't a coincidence. Perhaps realizing the storm they've brewed, Harry and Meghan want to shield their children from the fallout. But make no mistake, this is a calculated move in the grand chessboard of their Hollywood ambitions.
Will we see Prince Archie or Princess Lilibet at any public event soon? Russell doesn't think so, and who can blame him? The longer Harry and Meghan spend in America, the more surprising and mind-changing they become. But one thing is for sure – the stench of this plot against the royal family is getting harder to ignore. It's time to see through the smoke and mirrors and question just how low Meghan is willing to go in her quest for the spotlight. Pathetic indeed.