Despite the couple no longer being working royals and expressing criticism from overseas, Mr. Eden highlighted the King's track record of forgiveness within the family. Sarah Ferguson, who hadn't been seen with the working royals for 30 years, recently joined the family on Christmas Day, indicating a potential route back for Harry and Meghan, albeit with time.
Mr. Eden emphasized that King Charles's acceptance of the Duke and Duchess of York shows a possible way back for Harry and Meghan, although the situations differ. Unlike Andrew and Sarah, who have never attacked the royal family and consistently praised their relations, Harry and Meghan have been vocal critics.
Even with a relatively positive outlook, Mr. Eden cautioned that any reconciliation would necessitate Harry and Meghan acknowledging their ill-advised behavior and offering apologies. He pointed out that forgiveness requires repentance, and there is no indication that the California-based couple is willing to apologize for their insults and indiscretions.
Despite King Charles's potential forgiveness, Mr. Eden noted that Buckingham Palace staff and the wider royal family may remain wary of Harry and Meghan. The prospect of them rejoining the firm might not align with the desires of the majority of UK citizens. The article humorously suggests that, after a year of reconciliation and a failed year of redemption in 2023, perhaps they could attempt a "year of repentance" in 2025.
The piece concludes by questioning how long Harry and Meghan should remain in exile, especially given their eagerness to return despite the controversies surrounding them. It suggests that Harry's desire to be a senior royal may not align with the sentiments of the British public, who may find it challenging to forgive and forget his past behavior, lies, and insults.
