While I don't cast judgment on the use of surrogacy, utilizing it to deceive raises ethical concerns. According to British law, a royal baby cannot be born from the mother and ascend to the line of succession. Yet, the world readily accepts Lily as seventh in line, despite California having no record of her birth. This marks my seventh attempt to confirm, providing supposed birth details and even the location, such as Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital. However, the record's department insists: nope, she doesn't exist. The absence of verifiable evidence surrounding the birth of a royal princess raises eyebrows. Where is the substantiation? The Sussex Squad offers explanations, but skepticism persists.
No birth records, coupled with the suspicious circumstances of Archie's birth, leave us questioning the authenticity of Meghan's second pregnancy. With no concrete evidence, it becomes challenging to accept Lily's position in the line of succession based solely on the Sussexes' assertions. Is this a case of an elaborate hoax or a historic fraud?
Megan and Harry find themselves under scrutiny, and it's only fair for them to provide the necessary proof to substantiate Lily's place in the royal succession. Until then, the air surrounding this situation is thick with uncertainty.
