However, it appears that Meghan and Harry may not be able to attend the 2025 Invictus Games as planned. While Harry serves as a board member and founder of the Games, his lack of active promotion has raised concerns. Meghan, on the other hand, is neither a patron nor a board member, leading to questioning of her prominent role in the event. The perceived mismanagement of the Invictus Games has resulted in the loss of sponsors, jeopardizing the future of this esteemed charitable initiative. Critics argue that Harry's actions have undermined the integrity of the Games, which are known for their noble cause. Similar situations have occurred in the past, such as the resignation of Travis KCK, founder and CEO of Uber, and Vince McMahon, who stepped down from WWF due to misconduct. In alignment with these cases, Amazon has withdrawn its sponsorship of the 2024 and 2025 Invictus Games. The company cited concerns about the negative consequences associated with certain individuals, referring to Meghan and Harry
Additionally, Amazon expressed concerns about the lack of transparency regarding expenditures within the Invictus fund. They have called for an immediate investigation by the UK Charity Commission to scrutinize personal expenses and identify signs of financial misuse. It is suggested that those involved with the Invictus Games should either blow the whistle or fully cooperate with the investigation. Critics argue that Meghan Markle's involvement in the Games is questionable, as she is neither a patron, board member, nor possesses any military experience. They contend that her prominence in the event has turned it into a spectacle, focusing more on fashion and luxury than on the noble cause it represents
Criticism also extends to the perceived misuse of funds, with questions raised about who is paying for private jets, security, and extravagant wardrobes. Detractors argue that the focus should be on fundraising, suggesting that Meghan could have transformed the gala into a successful fundraising event by inviting potential donors and emphasizing the cause rather than personal extravagance.
As a result of these concerns, calls have been made to revoke Prince Harry's patron status within the Invictus Games. Furthermore, his meeting with a First Nation Chief while representing the crown at an Invictus event has been viewed as misleading. Critics argue that if the Games wish to prioritize athletes, it should be evident through the visible support of the logo, which has been lacking in the case of the couple. Instead, what has been showcased are expensive dinners and lavish clothing choices.
The controversy surrounding the Invictus Games continues to unfold, with Amazon's sponsorship withdrawal and the demand for Meghan Markle to return an alleged $20 million in stolen funds intensifying the debate. The future of the Games hangs in the balance as questions regarding financial transparency and the couple's involvement remain unanswered.
