Grant Harold, who served as a butler to Charles during his time as Prince of Wales, voiced concerns about the potential impact of Harry's candid discussions, suggesting that the royal family may not be thrilled with the interview. While acknowledging that Harry might have sought permission from his family to discuss the matter publicly, Harold shared his doubts based on his experience with the royal household. Phil Dampier, a royal commentator, noted that the King and Buckingham Palace have deliberately avoided responding to Harry's comments in recent years as part of a strategy to avoid exacerbating tensions and leaving room for reconciliation.
The revelation of Harry's interview has likely left palace courtiers scrambling, as they had been carefully managing the narrative surrounding the King's illness. Many observers see Harry's decision to speak publicly about his father's health as yet another example of his untrustworthiness, potentially damaging relations with the royal institution. Some speculate that Buckingham Palace may even consider legal action to prevent Harry from divulging further details in future interviews.
Critics argue that Harry's actions are despicable, accusing him of exploiting his father's illness for personal gain and sympathy. They argue that discussing someone's private health matters without their consent, especially when they are a public figure like the King, is highly inappropriate. The King has always valued his privacy and has chosen to share only what he deems necessary with the public. Many believe that Prince Harry should have obtained permission before discussing his father's health in the interview, as it now gives the impression that he is motivated by financial gain.
The interview has undoubtedly sparked controversy and raised questions about Harry's judgment. As the public awaits the full broadcast, concerns persist about the potential repercussions and the impact it may have on the already strained relationship between Harry and the firm.
