Schofield suggested that the couple may have received advice to distance themselves from the Archewell title due to its adverse effects on the charity. She expressed her observation that over the past few years, the Archewell brand has become muddled, leaving people uncertain about its core values and objectives as a charitable foundation. Schofield speculated that separating Archewell from their personal lives and the accompanying chaos might be a strategic move to mitigate the negative impact on the charity's brand and encourage people to take it more seriously.
Furthermore, Schofield criticized the use of royal titles in the rebranding, deeming it an unfavorable choice. She argued that it appeared as if the couple had taken advantage of the absence of Queen Elizabeth II and the incapacitation of the King, referring to Prince Charles, in utilizing their regal titles. Schofield emphasized that Prince Harry is not currently a working member of the Royal Family, leading to the perception that they are exploiting the situation for their own benefit.
In related news, there have been reports suggesting that Prince Harry is willing to assume a temporary royal role while his father, Prince Charles, is unwell. The Times newspaper stated that Prince Harry has indicated to friends that he would step into such a role during Charles's illness. Sources claimed that there have been several positive exchanges between the Duke and his father since the King's illness was diagnosed.
They further shared that it makes practical sense for the family to come together and support the King while he is unwell, highlighting the paramount importance of the well-being of the King and the Duchess of Cornwall, Kate. The specifics of the discussions held at Clarence House and subsequently remain private, but there is a sense that this arrangement could be workable, taking into consideration the familial bond and practical considerations.
