Furthermore, Scoffield criticized Harry's use of his royal titles, arguing that it exploits the legacy of the late Queen and implies a lack of commitment to his charitable efforts. She speculated that Harry's involvement in funding local newsrooms through Press Forward contradicts his previous claims about media toxicity driving him to leave the royal family. Scoffield also raised doubts about Harry's financial contributions to Press Forward, noting discrepancies between his claimed funds and the original donor's intentions.
The involvement of other wealthy individuals, such as Pierre Omidyar and the Ford family heirs, in funding Press Forward further complicates the situation. Omidyar's history of supporting censorious nonprofits and Harry's comparatively modest financial contribution raise questions about the initiative's integrity and long-term sustainability. Additionally, commentator Christopher Smithers accused Harry and Meghan of exploiting their royal connections for personal gain and manipulating public sympathy to advance their agendas, suggesting a pattern of narcissistic behavior.
In summary, the controversy surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's involvement in charitable initiatives like Archewell and Press Forward underscores broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct in philanthropy.
