Jobson highlights concerns in a commentary for The Sun, stressing that if tragedy were to strike, nine-year-old Prince George might find himself inheriting the throne prematurely. He notes that even the late Queen had expressed worries about this scenario. To address this delicate issue, King Charles III must carefully consider an alternative Regent. Princess Anne emerges as a potential candidate due to her steadfast commitment to the crown and unwavering sense of duty.
However, any changes to the line of succession or the appointment of a regent would require parliamentary approval. Jobson emphasizes the legal framework governing the succession, citing the Succession to the Crown Act 2013, which abolished the male primogeniture rule and introduced gender equality in the order of succession.
Historical precedents demonstrate instances where individuals were removed from the line of succession, such as in 2003 when Lord Don Patrick converted to Catholicism and in 1978 when Prince Michael of Kent married a Catholic. Given Prince Harry's status as a non-working royal, his removal from the line of succession could be considered crucial for the stability of the monarchy.
There are growing rumors that King Charles will take steps to remove Harry from the line of succession, particularly in light of concerns regarding his loyalty. Jobson suggests that letters patent issued by King Charles or, if necessary, an act of parliament could formalize this change, ensuring that only working royals and their direct heirs occupy positions in the line of succession. Such measures would not only uphold the monarchy's traditions but also safeguard the interests of the UK and the Commonwealth.
