Royal expert Tom Quinn weighed in, expressing concerns about Harry's situation. He highlighted Harry's potential oversight due to his accustomed royal lifestyle, where conventional rules may not apply. Quinn emphasized the stress this ordeal would bring to Harry and Meghan. The case aims to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security is obligated to disclose Harry's visa application responses. Neil Gardner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center For Freedom at The Heritage Foundation, emphasized the importance of transparency in this matter.
Lawyer Christopher Melcher, speaking exclusively to the Daily Express, noted the significance of Harry's past drug admission in his memoir and its implications for the visa case. The outcome rests on the decision of the judge presiding over the trial in Washington DC.
Quinn speculated on the potential consequences for Harry, suggesting that even if he admitted to past drug use, it might not necessarily impact his chance at US citizenship. However, the case's outcome could have implications for Harry's future, especially regarding his interest in becoming a US citizen, as discussed in his recent interview with Good Morning America.
Quinn reflected on Harry's upbringing in royalty and its influence on his approach to problem-solving, suggesting that Harry may assume he can always rely on lawyers to resolve his issues. The connection between Harry's past actions, his visa application, and his aspirations for US citizenship underscores the complexities of his situation and the potential ramifications of the ongoing legal proceedings.
